Date: 29.8.2017 / Article Rating: 5 / Votes: 700
Rts.rabotayes.compress.to #Problem solving and Holland International Study Center

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Problem solving and Holland International Study Center

Problem solving and Holland International Study Center

May/Fri/2018 | Uncategorized





Holland International Study Centre -…

Problem solving and Holland International Study Center

Write My Paper For Me -
Holland International Study Centre

botox resume This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the problem and Holland International Center site you are agreeing to thinking North School our policy on the use of cookies. Continue. 100 Allergan Units. Powder for solution for injection. Botulinum toxin * type A, 100 Allergan Units/vial. * from Clostridium botulinum. Botulinum toxin units are not interchangeable from one product to problem solving Study Center another . For a full list of excipients, see section 6.1.

Powder for solution for injection. BOTOX is indicated for: #8226; treatment of focal spasticity , including: dynamic equinus foot deformity due to spasticity in ambulant paediatric cerebral palsy patients, two years of age or older. wrist and hand disability due to thinking North Broward Preparatory School upper limb spasticity associated with stroke in adults. ankle disability due to lower limb spasticity associated with stroke in problem International Study adults. #8226; symptomatic relief of blepharospasm, hemifacial spasm and idiopathic cervical dystonia (spasmodic torticollis) #8226; prophylaxis of headaches in adults with chronic migraine (headaches on writing (Study Group), at least 15 days per month of which at least 8 days are with migraine) #8226; management of bladder dysfunctions in adult patients who are not adequately managed with anticholinergics. overactive bladder with symptoms of urinary incontinence, urgency and frequency. neurogenic detrusor overactivity with urinary incontinence due to solving and Holland International Study Center subcervical spinal cord injury (traumatic or non-traumatic), or multiple sclerosis. Of Analytical North Broward School? Skin and skin appendage disorder: #8226; management of severe hyperhidrosis of the axillae , which does not respond to topical treatment with antiperspirants or antihidrotics. #8226; temporary improvement in the appearance of the following facial lines, when the severity of and Holland International, these lines has an important psychological impact in adult patients: moderate to severe vertical lines between the eyebrows seen at write for me maximum frown (glabellar lines) moderate to severe lateral canthal lines (crow's feet lines) seen at problem and Holland International Study maximum smile. moderate to severe crow's feet lines seen at maximum smile and glabellar lines seen at critical thinking AUTO University maximum frown when treated simultaneously. Botulinum toxin units are not interchangeable from one product to another . Doses recommended in Allergan Units are different from other botulinum toxin preparations. And Holland International? Dosages for elderly patients are the same as for younger adults. Initial dosing should begin at the lowest recommended dose for the specific indication. Elderly patients with significant medical history and write my essay, concomitant medications should be treated with caution. There is limited data in patients older than 65 years managed with BOTOX for urinary incontinence with neurogenic detrusor overactivity and for facial lines (see section 5.1).

The safety and efficacy of problem and Holland International Center, BOTOX in the treatment of individual indications have not been established in children and adolescents under the expository University (Study ages listed in the table below. No data are available. #8226; Focal spasticity associated with paediatric cerebral palsy. #8226; Upper and lower limb spasticity associated with stroke. #8226; Blepharospasm/Hemifacial spasm/ Idiopathic Cervical dystonia. #8226; Chronic migraine (CM) #8226; Overactive Bladder (OAB) and Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity (NDO) #8226; Primary hyperhidrosis of the axillae. (limited experience in adolescents between 12 and 17 years, see sections 4.8 and 5.1) #8226; Glabellar lines seen at maximum frown and/or crow's feet lines seen at maximum smile. Method of Administration. BOTOX should only be administered by physicians with appropriate qualifications and problem solving International Center, expertise in the treatment and the use of the required equipment. This product is for University of Groningen Group) single use only and any unused solution should be discarded.

The most appropriate vial size should be selected for the indication. An injection volume of approximately 0.1 ml is recommended. A decrease or increase in the BOTOX dose is possible by administering a smaller or larger injection volume. The smaller the and Holland Study injection volume the less discomfort and less spread of toxin in the injected muscle occurs. This is of benefit in reducing effects on nearby muscles when small muscle groups are being injected.

For instructions on reconstitution of the powder for companies solution for injection, handling and disposal of problem and Holland International Study Center, vials please refer to section 6.6. Refer to writing essay University (Study Group) specific guidance for each indication described below. Generally valid optimum dose levels and number of injection sites per muscle have not been established for all indications. In these cases, individual treatment regimens should therefore be drawn up by the physician. Optimum dose levels should be determined by titration but the recommended maximum dose should not be exceeded. Focal spasticity associated with paediatric cerebral palsy. Sterile 23-26 gauge/0.60-0.45 mm needle. To be administered as a divided dose through single injections into problem and Holland Study, the medial and lateral heads of the critical AUTO University affected gastrocnemius muscle. Hemiplegia: the initial recommended total dose is 4 Units/kg body weight in the affected limb.

Diplegia: the problem solving International Center initial recommended total dose is 6 Units/kg body weight divided between the thinking is SKODA University affected limbs. 200 Units in total. Clinical improvement generally occurs within the first two weeks after injection. Repeat doses should be administered when the and Holland Center clinical effect of a previous injection diminishes but not more frequently than every three months. Expository University? It may be possible to adapt the problem and Holland Study dosage regimen to obtain an coursework Justin-Siena High, interval of at least six months between treatment sessions. Focal upper limb spasticity associated with stroke. Sterile 25, 27 or 30 gauge needle. Needle length should be determined based on muscle location and depth.

Localisation of the involved muscles with techniques such as electromyographic guidance, nerve stimulation, or ultrasound is recommended. And Holland International? Multiple injection sites may allow BOTOX to have more uniform contact with the innervation areas of the muscle and companies St. Louis, are especially useful in larger muscles. The exact dosage and problem solving International, number of injection sites may be tailored to the individual based on the size, number and location of muscles involved, the severity of spasticity, the presence of local muscle weakness, and the patient response to previous treatment. The following doses are recommended: Flexor digitorum profundus. 15 - 50 Units; 1-2 sites. Flexor digitorum sublimis.

15 - 50 Units; 1-2 sites. Thinking Is SKODA? Flexor carpi radialis. 15 - 60 Units; 1-2 sites. Flexor carpi ulnaris. 10 - 50 Units; 1-2 sites. 20 Units; 1-2 sites. Solving And Holland International? Flexor Pollicis Longus. 20 Units; 1-2 sites.

Between 200 and 240 Units divided among selected muscles. If it is deemed appropriate by the treating physician, the patient should be considered for re-injection when the clinical effect of the previous injection has diminished. Re-injections should occur no sooner than 12 weeks after the previous injection. The degree and pattern of muscle spasticity at the time of re-injection may necessitate alterations in the dose of BOTOX and muscles to be injected. Research Queen's College? The lowest effective dose should be used. Focal lower limb spasticity associated with stroke.

Sterile 25, 27 or 30 gauge needle. Needle length should be determined based on muscle location and depth. Localisation of the problem solving Study involved muscles with techniques such as electromyographic guidance, nerve stimulation, or ultrasound is recommended. Multiple injection sites may allow BOTOX to writing School have more uniform contact with the innervation areas of the muscle and are especially useful in larger muscles. The following diagrams indicate the problem Center injection sites for adult lower limb spasticity: The recommended dose for treating adult lower limb spasticity involving the meaning North School ankle is 300 Units divided among 3 muscles. Total Dosage; Number of Sites. Problem Solving And Holland? 75 Units; 3 sites. 75 Units; 3 sites.

75 Units; 3 sites. 75 Units; 3 sites. If it is deemed appropriate by the treating physician, the patient should be considered for AUTO University re-injection when the clinical effect of the and Holland International Study Center previous injection has diminished, but generally no sooner than 12 weeks after the previous injection. Sterile, 27-30 gauge/0.40-0.30 mm needle. Electromyographic guidance is not necessary. The initial recommended dose is High, 1.25-2.5 Units (0.05-0.1 ml volume at each site) injected into the medial and lateral orbicularis oculi of the problem and Holland International upper lid and the lateral orbicularis oculi of the lower lid. Additional sites in the brow area, the lateral orbicularis and in the upper facial area may also be injected if spasms here interfere with vision. Of Analytical Thinking Broward Preparatory? The following diagrams indicate the possible injection sites: The initial dose should not exceed 25 Units per eye. Problem? In the for me University management of blepharospasm total dosing should not exceed 100 Units in solving and Holland International Study Center total every 12 weeks. Avoiding injection near levator palpebrae superioris may reduce the complication of ptosis. Avoiding medial lower lid injections, and thereby reducing diffusion into the inferior oblique, may reduce the complication of diplopia.

In general, the initial effect of the write my essay for me University injections is seen within three days and solving International Study, reaches a peak at one to two weeks post-treatment. Each treatment lasts approximately three months, following which the procedure can be repeated indefinitely. Normally no additional benefit is conferred by treating more frequently than every three months. At repeat treatment sessions, the dose may be increased up to two-fold if the response from the initial treatment is considered insufficient - usually defined as an effect that does not last longer than two months. Of Analytical North Broward School? However, there appears to be little benefit obtainable from injecting more than 5 Units per site. Patients with hemifacial spasm or VII th nerve disorders should be treated as for unilateral blepharospasm, with other affected facial muscles being injected as needed. Electromyographic control may be necessary to identify affected small circumoral muscles. A 25, 27 or 30 gauge/0.50-0.30 mm needle may be used for superficial muscles, and a 22 gauge needle may be used for deeper musculature. The treatment of cervical dystonia typically may include injection of BOTOX into and Holland Center, the sternocleidomastoid, levator scapulae, scalene, splenius capitis, semispinalis, longissimus and/or the trapezius muscle(s). Writing Companies School? This list is not exhaustive as any of the muscles responsible for problem Center controlling head position may be involved and therefore require treatment. The muscle mass and meaning Broward, the degree of hypertrophy are factors to be taken into consideration when selecting the appropriate dose.

Muscle activation patterns can change spontaneously in problem solving and Holland cervical dystonia without a change in research College the clinical presentation of problem solving and Holland, dystonia. In case of any difficulty in isolating the individual muscles, injections should be made under electromyographic assistance. Multiple injection sites allow BOTOX to have more uniform contact with the innervation areas of the dystonic muscle and are especially useful in larger muscles. Argumentative Essay College? The optimal number of and Holland International Center, injection sites is dependent upon the size of the writing University of Groningen (Study Group) muscle to be chemically denervated. Problem Study Center? Dosing must be tailored to the individual patient based on the patient's head and neck position, location of pain, muscle hypertrophy, patient's body weight, and patient response. Initial dosing in North Preparatory School a naive patient should begin at the lowest effective dose. To minimise the incidence of problem solving and Holland International Study, dysphagia, the sternomastoid should not be injected bilaterally. The following doses are recommended: Head rotated toward side of shoulder elevation. 50 - 100 Units; at least 2 sites. 50 Units; 1 - 2 sites. 25 - 50 Units; 1 - 2 sites.

25 - 75 Units; 1 - 3 sites. 25 - 100 Units; 1 - 8 sites. Head rotation only. Meaning Of Analytical Thinking Broward Preparatory School? 25 - 100 Units; at problem International least 2 sites if 25 Units given. Head tilted toward side of shoulder elevation. 25 - 100 Units at posterior border; at least 2 sites if 25 Units given. 25 - 100 Units; at least 2 sites. 25 - 75 Units; at writing expository essay of Groningen (Study least 2 sites. 25 - 100 Units; 1 - 8 sites. Bilateral posterior cervical muscle spasm with elevation of the face.

Splenius capitis and problem solving Study, cervicis. 50 - 200 Units; 2 - 8 sites, treat bilaterally. (This is the write for me Adelphi total dose and not the dose for each side of the neck) No more than 50 Units should be given at any one injection site. No more than 100 Units should be given to the sternomastoid. No more than 200 Units in total should be injected for the first course of therapy, with adjustments made in subsequent courses dependent on the initial response, up to a maximum total dose of 300 Units. Treatment intervals of less than 10 weeks are not recommended. Sterile 30 gauge, 0.5 inch needle. Solving And Holland Study? A 1 inch needle may be needed in the neck region for patients with extremely thick neck muscles. Broward? Injections should be divided across 7 specific head/neck muscle areas as specified in the diagrams below. With the exception of the procerus muscle, which should be injected at 1 site (midline), all muscles should be injected bilaterally with half the number of injection sites administered to problem and Holland Study Center the left, and half to school coursework School the right side of the head and neck. The following diagrams indicate the injection sites: If there is a predominant pain location(s), additional injections to International Study Center one or both sides may be administered in up to 3 specific muscle groups (occipitalis, temporalis and trapezius), up to coursework Justin-Siena School the maximum dose per problem, muscle as indicated in the table below.

The following diagrams indicate recommended muscle groups for optional additional injections: 155 Units to 195 Units administered intramuscularly as 0.1 ml (5 Units) injections to coursework Justin-Siena High 31 and up to 39 sites. Total Dosage (number of problem solving and Holland Study, sites a ) 10 Units (2 sites) 20 Units (4 sites) 40 Units (8 sites) up to research essay 50 Units (up to 10 sites) 30 Units (6 sites) up to 40 Units (up to 8 sites) Cervical Paraspinal Muscle Group b. 20 Units (4 sites) 30 Units (6 sites) up to solving and Holland Center 50 Units (up to 10 sites) 155 Units to 195 Units. a 1 IM injection site = 0.1 ml = 5 Units BOTOX. b Dose distributed bilaterally. Write My Essay For Me University? The recommended re-treatment schedule is every 12 weeks. The injection needle should be filled (primed) with approximately 1 ml of the reconstituted BOTOX solution prior to the start of the solving Center injections (depending on the needle length) to remove any air.

The reconstituted solution of BOTOX (100 Units/10 ml) is injected via a flexible or rigid cystoscope, avoiding the trigone and base. The bladder should be instilled with enough saline to achieve adequate visualisation for essay St. Louis the injections and avoid backflow of the problem Study Center product, but over-distension should be avoided. Meaning Thinking North Broward Preparatory School? The needle should be inserted approximately 2 mm into the detrusor, and 20 injections of 0.5 ml each (total volume 10 ml) should be spaced approximately 1 cm apart (see figure below). For the final injection, approximately 1 ml of sterile unpreserved normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride for injection) should be injected so the problem and Holland International Study full dose is delivered. The recommended dose is 100 Units of BOTOX, as 0.5 ml (5 Units) injections across 20 sites in the detrusor muscle. For the patient preparation and monitoring, see section 4.4. After the Justin-Siena High School injections are given, the saline used for bladder wall visualisation should not be drained so that the problem solving and Holland International patients can demonstrate their ability to meaning Broward void prior to leaving the problem Study Center clinic. The patient should be observed for at least 30 minutes post-injection and essay writing St. Louis, until a spontaneous void has occurred. Patients should be considered for reinjection when the clinical effect of the previous injection has diminished but no sooner than 3 months from the prior bladder injection. Urinary incontinence due to neurogenic detrusor overactivity.

The injection needle should be filled (primed) with approximately 1 ml of the problem solving and Holland International reconstituted BOTOX solution prior to the start of the injections (depending on University (Study, the needle length) to problem and Holland remove any air. The reconstituted solution of BOTOX (200 Units/30 ml) is injected via a flexible or rigid cystoscope, avoiding the trigone and base. The bladder should be instilled with enough saline to achieve adequate visualisation for the injections and avoid backflow of the product, but over-distension should be avoided. The needle should be inserted approximately 2 mm into the detrusor, and 30 injections of school, 1 ml each (total volume 30 ml) should be spaced approximately 1 cm apart (see figure above). For the final injection, approximately 1 ml of sterile unpreserved normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride for injection) should be injected so the full dose is delivered. After the solving and Holland Study Center injections are given, the saline used for bladder wall visualisation should be drained.

The recommended dose is 200 Units of BOTOX, as 1 ml ( 6.7 Units) injections across 30 sites in the detrusor muscle. For the patient preparation and monitoring, see section 4.4. Patients should be considered for expository essay (Study reinjection when the clinical effect of the previous injection has diminished, but no sooner than 3 months from the prior bladder injection. Limited data are available beyond 2 treatments. No urodynamic data beyond 2 treatments and no histopathological data after repeated treatment are currently available. Patients should not receive multiple treatments in the event of limited symptomatic improvement.

SKIN AND SKIN APPENDAGE DISORDERS: Primary hyperhidrosis of the axillae. Sterile 30 gauge needle. The hyperhidrotic area to International Study be injected may be defined by essay of Groningen (Study Group) using standard staining techniques, e.g. Minor?s iodine-starch test. 50 Units of BOTOX is injected intradermally to each axilla, evenly distributed in multiple sites approximately 1-2 cm apart. And Holland Center? The recommended injection volume for intradermal injection is 0.1-0.2 ml.

Doses other than 50 Units per axilla cannot be recommended. Clinical improvement generally occurs within the school Justin-Siena first week after injection and persists for 4-7 months. Repeat injection of BOTOX can be administered when the clinical effect of a previous injection diminishes and and Holland Study Center, the treating physician deems it necessary. Research? Injections should not be repeated more frequently than every 16 weeks. And Holland? Glabellar lines seen at maximum frown. Sterile 30 gauge needle. Before injection, the thumb or index finger is to be placed firmly below the expository University of Groningen orbital rim in order to prevent extravasation below the orbital rim.

The needle should be oriented superiorly and medially during the injection. And Holland International Study? In addition, injections near the levator palpebrae superioris muscle must be avoided, particularly in patients with larger brow-depressor complexes (depressor supercilii). Essay College? Injections in the corrugator muscle must be done in Study Center the central part of that muscle, a distance of at least 1 cm above the arch of the eyebrows (see figure). Research Essay Queen's? Care should be taken to solving and Holland Study ensure that BOTOX is not injected into essay St. Louis School, a blood vessel when it is injected in the glabellar lines seen at maximum frown, see section 4.4. A volume of 0.1 ml (4 Units) is administered in each of the 5 injection sites (see Figure): 2 injections in each corrugator muscle and 1 injection in the procerus muscle for a total dose of 20 Units. In order to reduce the risk of eyelid ptosis, the and Holland International Study Center maximum dose of 4 Units for each injection site as well as the number of injection sites should not be exceeded. Treatment intervals should not be more frequent than every three months.

In the event of treatment failure or diminished effect following repeat injections, alternative treatment methods should be employed. In case of insufficient dose a second treatment session should be initiated by adjusting the total dose up to 40 or 50 Units, taking into account the analysis of the previous treatment failure (see information in All indications). The efficacy and safety of repeat injections of BOTOX for the treatment of glabellar lines beyond 12 months has not been evaluated. Crow's feet lines seen at essay writing companies maximum smile. Sterile 30 gauge needle. Solving International? Injections should be given with the needle tip bevel up and essay St. Louis, oriented away from the eye. The first injection (A) should be made approximately 1.5 to 2.0 cm temporal to the lateral canthus and problem solving and Holland Study, just temporal to the orbital rim. If the lines in the crow's feet region are above and below the lateral canthus, inject as shown in Figure 1. Alternatively, if the lines in the crow's feet region are primarily below the lateral canthus, inject as shown in Figure 2. In order to reduce the risk of eyelid ptosis, injections should be made temporal to is SKODA the orbital rim, thereby maintaining a safe distance from the muscle controlling eyelid elevation. Care should be taken to ensure that BOTOX is problem solving Study Center, not injected into a blood vessel when it is injected in meaning Preparatory the crow's feet lines seen at maximum smile (see section 4.4). A volume of 0.1 ml (4 Units) is solving and Holland Study, administered in each of the 3 injection sites per side (total of writing essay of Groningen (Study Group), 6 injection sites) in solving and Holland Center the lateral orbicularis oculi muscle, for a total dose of 24 Units in a total volume of 0.6 ml (12 Units per side). For simultaneous treatment with glabellar lines seen at critical is SKODA maximum frown, the and Holland Study dose is 24 Units for critical thinking crow's feet lines seen at maximum smile and 20 Units for and Holland International Study Center glabellar lines (see Administration guidance for of analytical thinking North Broward glabellar lines) for problem and Holland International Center a total dose of 44 Units in a total volume of 1.1 ml.

In order to reduce the risk of eyelid ptosis, the maximum dose of 4 Units for each injection site as well as the meaning of analytical thinking number of injection sites should not be exceeded. Treatment intervals should not be more frequent than every 3 months. The efficacy and safety of problem and Holland Center, repeat injections of BOTOX for the treatment of crow's feet lines beyond 12 months has not been evaluated. In case of treatment failure after the first treatment session, i.e. absence, at one month after injection, of significant clinical improvement from baseline, the companies St. Louis following actions should be taken: - Clinical verification, which may include electromyographic examination in a specialist setting, of the action of the solving and Holland Study Center toxin on the injected muscle(s); - Analysis of the causes of failure, e.g. bad selection of muscles to be injected, insufficient dose, poor injection technique, appearance of fixed contracture, antagonist muscles too weak, formation of toxin-neutralising antibodies; - Re-evaluation of the appropriateness of treatment with botulinum toxin type A; - In the absence of any undesirable effects secondary to the first treatment session, instigate a second treatment session as following: i) adjust the dose, taking into account the analysis of the earlier treatment failure; ii) use EMG; and iii) maintain a three-month interval between the two treatment sessions. In the event of treatment failure or diminished effect following repeat injections alternative treatment methods should be employed. - known hypersensitivity to botulinum toxin type A or to any of the excipients listed in section 6.1; - presence of infection at the proposed injection site(s). For the management of bladder disorders: - urinary tract infection at the time of treatment; - acute urinary retention at thinking School the time of treatment, in patients who are not routinely catheterising; - patients who are not willing and/or able to initiate catheterisation post-treatment if required; - presence of bladder calculi. The recommended dosages and problem and Holland Center, frequencies of administration of BOTOX should not be exceeded due to North Broward Preparatory School the potential for overdose, exaggerated muscle weakness, distant spread of toxin and the formation of neutralising antibodies. Initial dosing in treatment naive patients should begin with the lowest recommended dose for the specific indication. Prescribers and patients should be aware that side effects can occur despite previous injections being well tolerated. Caution should therefore be exercised on the occasion of each administration.

Side effects related to spread of and Holland Center, toxin distant from the site of administration have been reported (see section 4.8), sometimes resulting in death, which in some cases was associated with dysphagia, pneumonia and/or significant debility. The symptoms are consistent with the mechanism of expository of Groningen, action of problem International Center, botulinum toxin and have been reported hours to weeks after injection. Argumentative Essay Queen's College? The risk of symptoms is Center, probably greatest in critical thinking AUTO University patients who have underlying conditions and comorbidities that would predispose them to and Holland Study these symptoms, including children and adults treated for spasticity, and write my essay Adelphi, are treated with high doses. Patients treated with therapeutic doses may also experience exaggerated muscle weakness. Elderly and solving International, debilitated patients should be treated with caution. Critical Is SKODA AUTO? Generally, clinical studies of BOTOX did not identify differences in responses between the elderly and younger patients except for facial lines (see section 5.1). Dose selection for problem solving Study an elderly patient should be cautious, usually starting at the low end of the dosing range. Consideration should be given to the risk-benefit implications for research Queen's the individual patient before embarking on treatment with BOTOX.

Dysphagia has also been reported following injection to sites other than the cervical musculature (see section 4.4 'Cervical Dystonia'). BOTOX should only be used with extreme caution and under close supervision in problem International Center patients with subclinical or clinical evidence of defective neuromuscular transmission e.g. myasthenia gravis or Lambert-Eaton Syndrome in patients with peripheral motor neuropathic diseases (e.g. amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or motor neuropathy) and in patients with underlying neurological disorders. Such patients may have an increased sensitivity to agents such as BOTOX, even at therapeutic doses, which may result in excessive muscle weakness and an increased risk of clinically significant systemic effects including severe dysphagia and respiratory compromise. The botulinum toxin product should be used under specialist supervision in these patients and should only school coursework Justin-Siena School, be used if the benefit of treatment is considered to outweigh the risk. Patients with a history of dysphagia and aspiration should be treated with extreme caution. Patients or caregivers should be advised to seek immediate medical care if swallowing, speech or respiratory disorders arise. As with any treatment with the potential to allow previously-sedentary patients to problem solving International resume activities, the sedentary patient should be cautioned to (Study resume activity gradually. Solving And Holland? The relevant anatomy, and any alterations to the anatomy due to expository essay of Groningen Group) prior surgical procedures, must be understood prior to administering BOTOX and injection into vulnerable anatomic structures must be avoided.

Pneumothorax associated with injection procedure has been reported following the administration of BOTOX near the thorax. Caution is warranted when injecting in proximity to the lung (particularly the apices) or other vulnerable anatomic structures. Serious adverse events including fatal outcomes have been reported in patients who had received off-label injections of BOTOX directly into salivary glands, the oro-lingual-pharyngeal region, oesophagus and stomach. Some patients had pre-existing dysphagia or significant debility. Serious and/or immediate hypersensitivity reactions have been rarely reported including anaphylaxis, serum sickness, urticaria, soft tissue oedema, and problem solving and Holland International Study Center, dyspnoea. Some of these reactions have been reported following the use of BOTOX either alone or in conjunction with other products associated with similar reactions. If such a reaction occurs further injection of companies School, BOTOX should be discontinued and appropriate medical therapy, such as epinephrine, immediately instituted. And Holland International Study? One case of anaphylaxis has been reported in which the patient died after being injected with BOTOX inappropriately diluted with 5 ml of 1% lidocaine. As with any injection, procedure-related injury could occur. Critical Thinking AUTO University? An injection could result in localised infection, pain, inflammation, paraesthesia, hypoaesthesia, tenderness, swelling, erythema, and/or bleeding/bruising.

Needle-related pain and/or anxiety may result in vasovagal responses, e.g. syncope, hypotension, etc. Caution should be used when BOTOX is used in solving International Study the presence of inflammation at the proposed injection site(s) or when excessive weakness or atrophy is companies St. Louis School, present in the target muscle. Caution should also be exercised when BOTOX is used for problem solving International Center treatment of patients with peripheral motor neuropathic diseases (e.g., amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or motor neuropathy). There have been reports of school coursework Justin-Siena High, adverse events following administration of BOTOX involving the cardiovascular system, including arrhythmia and myocardial infarction, some with fatal outcomes. Some of International Study Center, these patients had risk factors including pre-existing cardiovascular disease. Expository Group)? New onset or recurrent seizures have been reported, typically in patients who are predisposed to experiencing these events.

The exact relationship of these events to botulinum toxin injection has not been established. The reports in children were predominantly from cerebral palsy patients treated for and Holland Study spasticity. Formation of argumentative, neutralising antibodies to botulinum toxin type A may reduce the effectiveness of BOTOX treatment by inactivating the biological activity of the toxin. Results from some studies suggest that BOTOX injections at more frequent intervals or at higher doses may lead to problem International Study greater incidence of antibody formation. When appropriate, the school Justin-Siena High School potential for antibody formation may be minimised by injecting with the lowest effective dose given at the longest clinically indicated intervals between injections. Problem Solving International Study Center? Clinical fluctuations during the repeated use of BOTOX (as with all botulinum toxins) may be a result of different vial reconstitution procedures, injection intervals, muscles injected and slightly differing potency values given by the biological test method used.

The safety and efficacy of BOTOX in indications other than those described for the paediatric population in section 4.1 has not been established. Post-marketing reports of possible distant spread of toxin have been very rarely reported in meaning thinking School paediatric patients with comorbidities, predominantly with cerebral palsy. In general the dose used in these cases was in excess of that recommended (see section 4.8). There have been rare spontaneous reports of death sometimes associated with aspiration pneumonia in children with severe cerebral palsy after treatment with botulinum toxin, including following off-label use (e.g. neck area). Extreme caution should be exercised when treating paediatric patients who have significant neurologic debility, dysphagia, or have a recent history of aspiration pneumonia or lung disease. Treatment in patients with poor underlying health status should be administered only if the potential benefit to the individual patient is considered to outweigh the risks. Focal spasticity associated with paediatric cerebral palsy and spasticity of the ankle, hand and problem and Holland International Center, wrist in writing adult post-stroke patients. BOTOX is a treatment of focal spasticity that has only been studied in association with usual standard of care regimens, and is not intended as a replacement for these treatment modalities. BOTOX is International Center, not likely to be effective in improving range of motion at a joint affected by a fixed contracture.

BOTOX should only be used for the treatment of focal spasticity in adult post-stroke patients if muscle tone reduction is thinking is SKODA University, expected to problem Center result in improved function (e.g. improvements in gait), or improved symptoms (e.g. reduction in muscle spasms or pain), and/or to facilitate care. Caution should be exercised when treating adult patients with post - stroke spasticity who may be at increased risk of fall. In clinical studies where patients were treated for lower limb spasticity (some of whom also received concurrent treatment for write for me Adelphi University upper limb spasticity), the incidence of fall was 7.2% and 4.9% of patients in the BOTOX and placebo groups, respectively. There have been post-marketing reports of death (sometimes associated with aspiration pneumonia) and of possible distant spread of toxin in children with co-morbidities, predominantly cerebral palsy following treatment with botulinum toxin. See warnings under section 4.4, 'Paediatric use'. Reduced blinking following botulinum toxin injection into the orbicularis muscle can lead to corneal exposure, persistent epithelial defect, and corneal ulceration, especially in patients with VII nerve disorders. Careful testing of Study Center, corneal sensation in eyes previously operated upon, avoidance of injection into the lower lid area to avoid ectropion, and vigorous treatment of any epithelial defect should be employed. Write University? This may require protective drops, ointment, therapeutic soft contact lenses, or closure of the eye by patching or other means.

Ecchymosis occurs easily in Study Center the soft eyelid tissues. This can be minimised by applying gentle pressure at the injection site immediately after injection. Thinking University? Because of the anticholinergic activity of botulinum toxin, caution should be exercised when treating patients at problem International Center risk for angle closure glaucoma, including patients with anatomically narrow angles. Patients with cervical dystonia should be informed of the possibility of experiencing dysphagia which may be very mild, but could be severe. Dysphagia may persist for thinking Preparatory School two to three weeks after injection, but has been reported to last up to five months post-injection. Consequent to the dysphagia there is the solving International potential for aspiration, dyspnoea and occasionally the need for essay writing St. Louis tube feeding. In rare cases dysphagia followed by aspiration pneumonia and death has been reported. Limiting the solving International Study Center dose injected into writing essay University of Groningen Group), the sternocleidomastoid muscle to less than 100 Units may decrease the occurrence of dysphagia. Patients with smaller neck muscle mass, or patients who receive bilateral injections into the sternocleidomastoid muscle, have been reported to Study be at greater risk of dysphagia. Dysphagia is attributable to my essay for me Adelphi University the spread of the toxin to solving and Holland International Study the oesophageal musculature. Injections into the levator scapulae may be associated with an increased risk of upper respiratory infection and argumentative research essay Queen's, dysphagia.

Dysphagia may contribute to decreased food and water intake resulting in weight loss and dehydration. Patients with subclinical dysphagia may be at increased risk of experiencing more severe dysphagia following a BOTOX injection. No efficacy has been shown for BOTOX in problem solving International the prophylaxis of headaches in patients with episodic migraine (headaches on 15 days per month). Patient preparation and monitoring. Prophylactic antibiotics should be administered to patients with sterile urine or asymptomatic bacteriuria in argumentative essay Queen's College accordance with local standard practice. The decision to discontinue anti-platelet therapy should be subject to local guidance and problem and Holland Study, benefit/risk consideration for thinking North School the individual patient. Patients on anti-coagulant therapy need to be managed appropriately to problem solving Center decrease the risk of bleeding. School Justin-Siena High? Appropriate medical caution should be exercised when performing the cystoscopy. The patient should be observed for at problem solving and Holland Center least 30 minutes post-injection. In patients who are not regularly practicing catheterisation, post-void residual urine volume should be assessed within 2 weeks post-treatment and periodically as medically appropriate. Patients should be instructed to contact their physician if they experience difficulties in voiding as catheterisation may be required.

Prior to injection an intravesical instillation of diluted local anaesthetic, with or without sedation, may be used, per local site practice. If a local anaesthetic instillation is performed, the bladder should be drained and rinsed with sterile saline before the next steps of the injection procedure. Urinary incontinence due to neurogenic detrusor overactivity. BOTOX injection can be performed under general or local anaesthesia with or without sedation. If a local anaesthetic intravesical instillation is write Adelphi University, performed, the bladder should be drained and rinsed with sterile saline before the next steps of the injection procedure. Problem Solving International Center? Autonomic dysreflexia associated with the procedure can occur and greater vigilance is required in coursework Justin-Siena High School patients known to problem solving International Center be at risk. SKIN AND SKIN APPENDAGE DISORDER.

Primary hyperhidrosis of the axillae. Medical history and physical examination, along with specific additional investigations as required, should be performed to exclude potential causes of secondary hyperhidrosis (e.g. Writing St. Louis School? hyperthyroidism, phaeochromocytoma). Problem Solving And Holland Study Center? This will avoid symptomatic treatment of of analytical thinking North, hyperhidrosis without the problem solving and Holland International diagnosis and/or treatment of underlying disease. Glabellar lines seen at maximum frown and/or crow's feet lines seen at maximum smile. Critical Thinking? It is mandatory that BOTOX is used for one single patient treatment only during a single session.

The excess of unused product must be disposed of as detailed in problem International section 6.6. Particular precautions should be taken for product preparation and administration as well as for the inactivation and disposal of the remaining unused solution (see section 6.6). The use of BOTOX is not recommended in individuals under 18 years. Thinking School? There is limited phase 3 clinical data with BOTOX in problem International Study patients older than 65 years. Care should be taken to ensure that BOTOX is not injected into a blood vessel when it is injected in argumentative research essay Queen's College the glabellar seen at solving and Holland International maximum frown or in the crow's feet lines seen at maximum smile, see section 4.2. There is a risk of eyelid ptosis following treatment, refer to Section 4.2 for administration instructions on how to minimise this risk. Theoretically, the effect of write my essay Adelphi, botulinum toxin may be potentiated by aminoglycoside antibiotics or spectinomycin, or other medicinal products that interfere with neuromuscular transmission (e.g. neuromuscular blocking agents). The effect of administering different botulinum neurotoxin serotypes at solving and Holland Center the same time or within several months of each other is unknown. Excessive neuromuscular weakness may be exacerbated by administration of another botulinum toxin prior to the resolution of the effects of a previously administered botulinum toxin. No interaction studies have been performed.

No interactions of clinical significance have been reported. There are no data available on the concomitant use of anticholinergics with BOTOX injections in the management of overactive bladder. There are no adequate data from the school coursework use of botulinum toxin type A in pregnant women. Studies in animals have shown reproductive toxicity (see Section 5.3). Solving Study? The potential risk for School humans is unknown. BOTOX is not recommended during pregnancy and in women of childbearing potential not using contraception. There is no information on whether BOTOX is excreted in human milk.

The use of BOTOX during breast-feeding cannot be recommended. There are no adequate data on the effects on fertility from the use of botulinum toxin type A in women of childbearing potential. Studies in male and female rats have shown fertility reductions (see section 5.3). No studies on problem International Study, the effects on the ability to drive and use machines have been performed. However, BOTOX may cause asthenia, muscle weakness, somnolence, dizziness and visual disturbance, which could affect driving and thinking Broward Preparatory School, the operation of machinery. In controlled clinical trials adverse events considered by the investigators to Study Center be related to BOTOX were reported in 35% of the patients with blepharospasm, 28% with cervical dystonia, 17% with paediatric cerebral palsy, 11% with primary hyperhidrosis of the axillae, 16% with focal spasticity of the upper limb associated with stroke, 15% with focal spasticity of the lower limb associated with stroke, 26% with overactive bladder, and 32% with neurogenic detrusor overactivity.

In clinical trials for chronic migraine, the incidence was 26% with the first treatment and declined to companies School 11% with a second treatment. In controlled clinical trials for problem and Holland Study glabellar lines seen at maximum frown, adverse events considered by the investigators to be related to BOTOX were reported in 23% (placebo 19%) of patients. In treatment cycle 1 of the pivotal controlled clinical trials for crow's feet lines seen at maximum smile, such events were reported in 8% (24 Units for crow's feet lines alone) and 6% (44 Units: 24 Units for crow's feet lines administered simultaneously with 20 Units for glabellar lines) of patients compared to 5% for placebo. Adverse reactions may be related to treatment, injection technique or both. In general, adverse reactions occur within the coursework High first few days following injection and, while generally transient, may have a duration of problem and Holland International Study Center, several months or, in rare cases, longer. Thinking Is SKODA University? Local muscle weakness represents the expected pharmacological action of botulinum toxin in muscle tissue. However, weakness of adjacent muscles and/or muscles remote from the problem and Holland site of research Queen's, injection has been reported. As is expected for International any injection procedure, localised pain, inflammation, paraesthesia, hypoaesthesia, tenderness, swelling/oedema, erythema, localised infection, bleeding and/or bruising have been associated with the argumentative injection. Needle-related pain and/or anxiety have resulted in vasovagal responses, including transient symptomatic hypotension and syncope.

Fever and flu syndrome have also been reported after injections of botulinum toxin. b) Adverse reactions - frequency by indication. The frequency of adverse reactions reported in the clinical trials is defined as follows: Very Common (#8805; 1/10); Common (#8805;1/100 to 1/10); Uncommon (#8805;1/1,000 to 1/100); Rare (#8805;1/10,000 to 1/1,000); Very Rare (1/10,000). Focal spasticity associated with paediatric cerebral palsy. System Organ Class. Infections and infestations. Viral infection, ear infection.

Nervous system disorders. Somnolence, gait disturbance, paraesthesia. Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders. Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders. Myalgia, muscular weakness, pain in extremity. Renal and urinary disorders. General disorders and and Holland Center, administration site conditions. Malaise, injection site pain, asthenia. Injury, poisoning and writing expository essay of Groningen, procedural complications. Focal upper limb spasticity associated with stroke. System Organ Class.

Nervous system disorders. Solving And Holland International Center? Hypoasthesia, headache, paraesthesia, incoordination, amnesia. Ear and labyrinth disorders. Nausea, oral paraesthesia. Skin and is SKODA AUTO University, subcutaneous tissue disorders. Dermatitis, pruritus, rash. Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders. Pain in extremity, muscle weakness. General disorders and administration site conditions.

Injection site pain, pyrexia, influenza-like illness, injection site haemorrhage, injection site irritation. Asthenia, pain, injection site hypersensitivity, malaise, peripheral oedema. Some of the International Study uncommon events may be disease related. Focal lower limb spasticity associated with stroke. System Organ Class. Skin and thinking AUTO University, subcutaneous tissue disorders. Study? Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders. Arthralgia, musculoskeletal stiffness.

General disorders and administration site conditions. System Organ Class. Nervous system disorders. Dizziness, facial paresis, facial palsy. Punctate keratitis, lagophthalmos, dry eye, photophobia, eye irritation, lacrimation increase.

Keratitis, ectropion, diplopia, entropion, visual disturbance, blurred vision. Corneal ulceration, corneal epithelium defect, corneal perforation. Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders. Essay College? General disorders and administration site conditions. Irritation, face oedema. System Organ Class.

Infections and infestations. Rhinitis, upper respiratory infection. Nervous system disorders. Dizziness, hypertonia, hypoaesthesia, somnolence, headache. Diplopia, eyelid ptosis. Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders. Dry mouth, nausea. Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders.

Musculoskeletal stiffness and musculoskeletal soreness. General disorders and administration site conditions. Asthenia, influenza-like illness, malaise. System Organ Class. Nervous system disorders. Headache*, migraine*, facial paresis. Problem And Holland Study Center? Skin and argumentative Queen's College, subcutaneous tissue disorders.

Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders. And Holland International Study? Neck pain, myalgia, musculoskeletal pain, musculoskeletal stiffness, muscle spasms, muscle tightness, muscular weakness. General disorders and administration site conditions. Injection site pain. * In placebo-controlled trials, headache and my essay for me University, migraine, including serious cases of intractable or worsening of problem solving and Holland, headache/migraine, were reported more frequently with BOTOX (9%) than with placebo (6%). They typically occurred within the first month after the injections and their incidence declined with repeated treatments.

System Organ Class. Infections and infestations. Urinary tract infection. Renal and urinary disorders. Urinary retention, pollakiuria, leukocyturia. Residual urine volume* *elevated post-void residual urine volume (PVR) not requiring catheterisation. #8224; procedure-related adverse reactions. In the critical AUTO University phase 3 clinical trials urinary tract infection was reported in 25.5% of patients treated with BOTOX 100 Units and 9.6% of patients treated with placebo. Urinary retention was reported in 5.8% of problem solving, patients treated with BOTOX 100 Units and in 0.4% of argumentative research essay Queen's College, patients treated with placebo. Clean intermittent catheterisation was initiated in 6.5% of patients following treatment with BOTOX 100 Units versus 0.4% in the placebo group.

Overall, 42.5% of patients (n = 470) were #8805; 65 years of problem International Study, age and thinking AUTO University, 15.1% (n = 167) were #8805; 75 years of age. No overall difference in the safety profile following BOTOX treatment was observed between patients #8805; 65 years compared to patients 65 years in problem solving and Holland Study Center these studies, with the exception of urinary tract infection where the incidence was higher in elderly patients in both the placebo and BOTOX groups compared to the younger patients. No change was observed in the overall safety profile with repeat dosing. Urinary incontinence due to neurogenic detrusor overactivity. System Organ Class.

Infections and infestations. Urinary tract infection a, b , bacteriuria b. Residual urine volume** b. Musculoskeletal and thinking AUTO, connective tissue disorders. Problem Study Center? Muscular weakness#8224; a , muscle spasm a. Renal and urinary disorders. Urinary retention a, b. Haematuria* a, b , bladder diverticulum a , dysuria* b. General disorders and administration site conditions. Fatigue#8224; a , gait disturbance#8224; a. Argumentative Research Essay? Injury, poisoning and procedural complications. Problem International Study? Autonomic dysreflexia* a , fall#8224; a. * procedure-related adverse reactions. ** elevated PVR not requiring catheterisation. #8224; only in multiple sclerosis. a Adverse reactions occurring in the pivotal Phase 3 clinical trials. b Adverse reactions occurring in the post-approval study of essay companies, BOTOX 100U in MS patients not catheterising at problem solving baseline. In the phase 3 clinical trials, urinary tract infection was reported in 49% of patients treated with BOTOX 200 Units and in 36% of patients treated with placebo (in multiple sclerosis patients: 53% vs. 29%, respectively; in spinal cord injury patients: 45% vs.

42%, respectively). Urinary retention was reported in 17% of patients treated with BOTOX 200 Units and in 3% of patients treated with placebo (in multiple sclerosis patients: 29% vs. 4%, respectively; in spinal cord injury patients: 5% vs. 1%, respectively). Among patients who were not catheterising at baseline prior to treatment, catheterisation was initiated in 39% following treatment with BOTOX 200 Units versus 17% on placebo.

The risk of my essay for me University, urinary retention increased in problem Study patients older than 65 years. No change in the type and frequency of adverse reactions was observed following 2 treatments. Critical Thinking Is SKODA? In the post-approval study of BOTOX 100 Units in MS patients not catheterising at baseline, no difference on problem and Holland International, the MS exacerbation annualised rate (i.e. number of research College, MS exacerbation events per patient-year) was observed (BOTOX=0, placebo=0.07). Catheterisation was initiated in 15.2% of patients following treatment with BOTOX 100 Units versus 2.6% on problem International Study Center, placebo (refer to Section 5.1). SKIN AND SKIN APPENDAGE DISORDER: Primary hyperhidrosis of the axillae. System Organ Class. Nervous system disorders. Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders. Hyperhidrosis (non axillary sweating), abnormal skin odour, pruritus, subcutaneous nodule, alopecia. Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders.

Pain in extremity. Muscular weakness, myalgia, arthropathy. General disorders and administration site conditions. Injection site pain. Pain, injection site oedema, injection site haemorrhage, injection site hypersensitivity, injection site irritation, asthenia, injection site reactions.

Increase in research essay Queen's College non axillary sweating was reported in 4.5% of patients within 1 month after injection and showed no pattern with respect to anatomical sites affected. Resolution was seen in problem solving Study Center approximately 30% of the patients within four months. Weakness of the critical thinking arm has been also reported uncommonly (0.7%) and was mild, transient, did not require treatment and recovered without sequelae. This adverse event may be related to treatment, injection technique, or both. In the uncommon event of problem and Holland Study, muscle weakness being reported a neurological examination may be considered. In addition, a re-evaluation of injection technique prior to subsequent injection is essay writing, advisable to ensure intradermal placement of injections. In an uncontrolled safety study of BOTOX (50 Units per problem and Holland Study Center, axilla) in paediatric patients 12 to 17 years of age (n= 144), adverse reactions occurring in more than a single patient (2 patients each) comprised injection site pain and hyperhidrosis (non-axillary sweating).

System Organ Class. Infections and infestations. Nervous system disorders. Blepharitis, eye pain, visual disturbance. Nausea, oral dryness. Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders. Argumentative Essay Queen's College? Skin tightness, oedema (face, eyelid, periorbital), photosensitivity reaction, pruritus, dry skin. Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders. Localised muscle weakness. Problem Solving And Holland International Study? General disorders and administration site conditions. Critical Thinking Is SKODA AUTO? Flu syndrome, asthenia, fever.

The following adverse drug reactions were reported in the double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical studies following injection of BOTOX 24 Units for crow's feet lines alone: System Organ Class. Problem And Holland International Study Center? General disorders and North Broward Preparatory School, administration site conditions. Injection site haemorrhage*, injection site haematoma* Injection site pain*, injection site paraesthesia. International Center? *procedure-related adverse reactions. Crow's feet lines and glabellar lines. The following adverse drug reactions were reported in double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical studies following injection of BOTOX 44 Units (simultaneous treatment of crow's feet lines and glabellar lines): System Organ Class. General disorders and administration site conditions. Of Analytical North? Injection site haematoma* Injection site haemorrhage*, injection site pain* *procedure-related adverse reactions. No change was observed in the overall safety profile following repeat dosing. c) Additional information. The following list includes adverse drug reactions or other medically relevant adverse events that have been reported since the drug has been marketed, regardless of indication, and may be in addition to those cited in and Holland International section 4.4 (Special warnings and precautions for use), and section 4.8 (Undesirable effects). System Organ Class.

Immune system disorders. Anaphylaxis, angioedema, serum sickness, urticaria. Metabolism and nutrition disorders. Nervous system disorders. Brachial plexopathy, dysphonia, dysarthria, facial paresis, hypoaesthesia, muscle weakness, myasthenia gravis, peripheral neuropathy, paraesthesia, radiculopathy, seizures, syncope, facial palsy. Angle-closure glaucoma (for treatment of blepharospasm), lagophthalmos, strabismus, blurred vision, visual disturbance. Coursework Justin-Siena High School? Ear and labyrinth disorders. Solving And Holland Study? Hypoacusis, tinnitus, vertigo.

Arrhythmia, myocardial infarction. Essay Writing Companies School? Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders. Problem International? Aspiration pneumonia (some with fatal outcome), dyspnoea, respiratory depression, respiratory failure. Abdominal pain, diarrhoea, constipation, dry mouth, dysphagia, nausea, vomiting. Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders. Alopecia, dermatitis psoriasiform, erythema multiforme, hyperhidrosis, madarosis, pruritus, rash.

Musculoskeletal and meaning of analytical, connective tissue disorders. Muscle atrophy, myalgia. General disorders and administration site conditions. Denervation atrophy, malaise, pyrexia. Reporting of suspected adverse reactions. Reporting suspected adverse reactions after authorisation of the medicinal product is important. It allows continued monitoring of the benefit/risk balance of the medicinal product. Healthcare professionals are asked to solving report any suspected adverse reactions via the Yellow Card Scheme, Website: www.mhra.gov.uk/yellowcard. Overdose of BOTOX is a relative term and depends upon dose, site of injection, and underlying tissue properties.

No cases of systemic toxicity resulting from meaning North School, accidental injection of BOTOX have been observed. Excessive doses may produce local, or distant, generalised and profound neuromuscular paralysis. Problem Solving And Holland International? No cases of ingestion of writing expository University of Groningen Group), BOTOX have been reported. Signs and symptoms of overdose are not apparent immediately post-injection. Should accidental injection or ingestion occur or overdose be suspected, the patient should be medically monitored for up to several weeks for problem solving and Holland Study progressive signs and symptoms of muscular weakness, which could be local or distant from the site of injection and may include ptosis, diplopia, dysphagia, dysarthria, generalised weakness or respiratory failure. These patients should be considered for further medical evaluation and appropriate medical therapy immediately instituted, which may include hospitalisation.

If the musculature of the oropharynx and oesophagus are affected, aspiration may occur which may lead to development of aspiration pneumonia. If the respiratory muscles become paralysed or sufficiently weakened, intubation and write University, assisted respiration will be required until recovery takes place and may involve the need for a tracheostomy and prolonged mechanical ventilation, in addition to other general supportive care. ATC class M03A X01 and ATC class D11AX . The active constituent in BOTOX is a protein complex derived from Clostridium botulinum . The protein consists of type A neurotoxin and several other proteins. Under physiological conditions it is presumed that the problem solving and Holland International complex dissociates and releases the pure neurotoxin. Clostridium botulinum toxin type A neurotoxin complex blocks peripheral acetyl choline release at presynaptic cholinergic nerve terminals.

Intramuscular injection of the thinking AUTO neurotoxin complex blocks cholinergic transport at the neuromuscular junction by preventing the release of acetylcholine. The nerve endings of the neuromuscular junction no longer respond to nerve impulses and secretion of the and Holland Center chemotransmitter is prevented (chemical denervation). Re-establishment of impulse transmission is by newly formed nerve endings and motor end plates. Writing St. Louis? Clinical evidence suggests that BOTOX reduces pain and neurogenic inflammation and elevates cutaneous heat pain thresholds in a capsaicin induced trigeminal sensitization model. Recovery after intramuscular injection takes place normally within 12 weeks of injection as nerve terminals sprout and reconnect with the endplates. After intradermal injection, where the target is the eccrine sweat glands, the problem solving International Center effect lasted for about 4-7 months in patients treated with 50 Units per axilla. There is limited clinical trial experience of the of analytical Broward Preparatory School use of BOTOX in primary axillary hyperhidrosis in adolescents between the problem solving and Holland Study ages of 12 and 18. A single, year long, uncontrolled, repeat dose, safety study was conducted in US paediatric patients 12 to 17 years of Justin-Siena High School, age (N=144) with severe primary hyperhidrosis of the axillae. Participants were primarily female (86.1%) and Caucasian (82.6%).

Participants were treated with a dose of 50 Units per axilla for a total dose of 100 Units per patient per treatment. However, no dose finding studies have been conducted in adolescents so no recommendation on posology can be made. Efficacy and safety of problem solving and Holland International Center, BOTOX in this group have not been established. Of Groningen (Study Group)? BOTOX blocks the release of neurotransmitters associated with the genesis of and Holland Center, pain. For Me Adelphi? The presumed mechanism for headache prophylaxis is by blocking peripheral signals to the central nervous system, which inhibits central sensitisation, as suggested by pre-clinical and clinical pharmacodynamic studies. Following intradetrusor injection, BOTOX affects the solving International Study efferent pathways of meaning Preparatory School, detrusor activity via inhibition of and Holland International, acetylcholine release. In addition BOTOX inhibits afferent neurotransmitters and sensory pathways.

Clinical efficacy and safety. Focal upper limb spasticity associated with stroke. In controlled and open, non-controlled studies, doses between 200 and 240 Units in wrist and flexor muscles were divided among the selected muscles at thinking AUTO University a given treatment session. Solving And Holland International? In controlled studies, improvement in muscle tone occurred within two weeks with the peak effect generally seen within four to six weeks. In an writing expository essay Group), open, non-controlled continuation study, most patients were re-injected after an interval of 12 to 16 weeks, when the problem Center effect on muscle tone had diminished. These patients received up to four injections with a maximal cumulative dose of 960 Units over 54 weeks. Write For Me University? Focal lower limb spasticity associated with stroke. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, multi-centre, phase 3 clinical study was conducted in problem solving Study Center adult post-stroke patients with lower limb spasticity affecting the ankle.

A total of 120 patients were randomised to receive either BOTOX (n=58; total dose of 300 Units) or placebo (n=62). Significant improvement compared to expository University Group) placebo was observed in the primary endpoint for problem Study the overall change from meaning of analytical Broward Preparatory School, baseline up to week 12 in Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ankle score, which was calculated using the area under the solving and Holland curve (AUC) approach. Significant improvements compared to placebo were also observed for the mean change from baseline in MAS ankle score at individual post-treatment visits at weeks 4, 6 and 8. The proportion of responders (patients with at least a 1 - grade improvement) was also significantly higher (67% - 68%) than in placebo - treated patients (31% - 36%) at these visits. BOTOX treatment was also associated with significant improvement in the investigator's clinical global impression (CGI) of functional disability compared to placebo although the difference was not significant for the patient's CGI. In initial controlled clinical trials to establish safety and efficacy for essay Queen's cervical dystonia, doses of reconstituted BOTOX ranged from 140 to 280 Units.

In more recent studies, doses ranged from 95 to 360 Units (with an approximate mean of 240 Units). Clinical improvement generally occurs within the first two weeks after injection. The maximum clinical benefit generally occurs by six weeks post-injection. The duration of beneficial effect reported in clinical studies showed substantial variation (from 2 to 33 weeks) with a typical duration of problem solving Study Center, approximately 12 weeks. Research Essay Queen's? Chronic migraine patients without any concurrent headache prophylaxis who, during a 28-day baseline, had at least 4 episodes and #8805; 15 headache days (with at least 4 hours of continuous headache) with at least 50% being migraine/probable migraine, were studied in two Phase 3 clinical trials. And Holland Study? Patients were allowed to Adelphi University use acute headache treatments and 66% overused acute treatments during the solving International Study Center baseline period. During the double-blind phase of the trials, the main results achieved after two BOTOX treatments administered at a 12-week interval are shown in the table below. Mean change from baseline at Week 24.

Frequency of headache days. Frequency of moderate/severe headache days. Frequency of migraine/probable migraine days. % patients with 50% reduction in expository University (Study headache days. Problem Solving And Holland Study? Total cumulative hours of headache on headache days. Frequency of headache episodes. Total HIT-6* scores. * Headache Impact Test. The treatment effect appeared smaller in the subgroup of male patients (n=188) than in the whole study population. Two double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, 24-week phase 3 clinical studies were conducted in patients with overactive bladder with symptoms of urge urinary incontinence, urgency, and frequency. A total of 1105 patients (mean age of 60 years), whose symptoms had not been adequately managed with at least one anticholinergic therapy (inadequate response or intolerable side effects), were randomised to receive either 100 Units of BOTOX (n=557), or placebo (n=548), after having discontinued anticholinergics for more than one week. Primary and thinking North Broward, Secondary Endpoints at problem Study Baseline and Change from argumentative essay, Baseline in Pooled Pivotal Studies: Daily Frequency of Urinary Incontinence Episodes.

Mean Change #8224; at Week 2. Mean Change #8224; at Week 6. Mean Change #8224; at Week 12 a. Proportion with Positive Treatment Response using Treatment Benefit Scale (%) Daily Frequency of Micturition Episodes. Mean Change #8224; at Week 12 b. Daily Frequency of Urgency Episodes. Mean Change #8224; at Week 12 b. Incontinence Quality of Life Total Score. Mean Change #8224; at problem solving Center Week 12 bc. King's Health Questionnaire: Role Limitation. Mean Change #8224; at Week 12 bc. King's Health Questionnaire: Social Limitation. Mean Change #8224; at Week 12 bc. Percentage of patients achieving full continence at Week 12 (dry patients over a 3-day diary) Percentage of patients achieving reduction from baseline in urinary incontinence episodes at Week 12. #8224; Least Squares (LS) mean changes are presented. a Co-primary endpoints. b Secondary endpoints. c Pre-defined minimally important change from baseline was +10 points for of analytical thinking Broward Preparatory I-QOL and -5 points for KHQ. The median duration of response following BOTOX treatment, based on patient request for re-treatment, was 166 days ( 24 weeks).

The median duration of response, based on patient request for re-treatment, in solving and Holland Center patients who continued into the open label extension study and school coursework Justin-Siena High School, received treatments with only BOTOX 100 Units (N=438), was 212 days ( A total of 839 patients were evaluated in a long-term open-label extension study. Center? For all efficacy endpoints, patients experienced consistent response with re-treatments. Essay Writing? The mean reductions from baseline in daily frequency of urinary incontinence were -3.07 (n=341), -3.49 (n=292), and -3.49 (n=204) episodes at week 12 after the first, second, and third BOTOX 100 Unit treatments, respectively. The corresponding proportions of patients with a positive treatment response on the Treatment Benefit Scale were 63.6% (n=346), 76.9% (n=295), and 77.3% (n=207), respectively. In the pivotal studies, none of the problem International Study Center 615 patients with analysed serum specimens developed neutralising antibodies after 1 3 treatments. Research Essay College? In patients with analysed specimens from the pivotal phase 3 and the open-label extension studies, neutralising antibodies developed in 0 of problem solving and Holland, 954 patients (0.0%) while receiving BOTOX 100 Unit doses and 3 of 260 patients (1.2%) after subsequently receiving at least one 150 Unit dose. One of these three patients continued to experience clinical benefit. Writing Expository Essay (Study? Compared to the overall BOTOX treated population, patients who developed neutralising antibodies generally had shorter duration of response and consequently received treatments more frequently (see section 4.4). And Holland International Center? Urinary incontinence due to neurogenic detrusor overactivity.

Pivotal Phase 3 Clinical Trials. Two double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised phase 3 clinical studies were conducted in a total of 691 patients with spinal cord injury or multiple sclerosis, who were not adequately managed with at critical AUTO University least one anticholinergic agent and were either spontaneously voiding or using catheterisation. These patients were randomised to receive either 200 Units of BOTOX (n=227), 300 Units of BOTOX (n=223), or placebo (n=241). Primary and Secondary Endpoints at Baseline and Change from Baseline in Pooled Pivotal Studies: Weekly Frequency of Urinary Incontinence. Mean Change #8224; at Week 2. Mean Change #8224; at Week 6 a. Mean Change #8224; at Week 12. Maximum Cystometric Capacity (ml) Mean Change #8224; at Week 6 b. Maximum Detrusor Pressure during 1st Involuntary Detrusor Contraction (cmH20) Mean Change #8224; at Week 6 b. Incontinence Quality of Life Total Score c,d. Mean Change #8224; at Week 6 b. Mean Change #8224; at Week 12.

Percentage of solving Center, patients achieving full continence at Week 6 (dry patients over a 7 day diary) Percentage of patients achieving reduction from baseline in urinary incontinence episodes at Week 6. Thinking University? #8224; LS mean changes are presented. a Primary endpoint. b Secondary endpoints. c I-QOL total score scale ranges from 0 (maximum problem) to 100 (no problem at all). d In the and Holland pivotal studies, the essay writing companies pre-specified minimally important difference (MID) for problem solving and Holland Study Center I-QOL total score was 8 points based on MID estimates of 4-11 points reported in write for me University neurogenic detrusor overactivity patients. The median duration of response, based on time to qualification for re-treatment (time to 50% reduction in incontinence episodes), was 42 weeks in the 200 Unit dose group. The median interval between the problem and Holland first and second administrations was 42 weeks in patients with spinal cord injury and meaning of analytical thinking North Broward Preparatory School, 45 weeks in patients with multiple sclerosis. Problem International? The median duration of response, based on time to qualification for re-treatment (at least 1 urinary incontinence episode in a 3 day diary), in patients who continued into the open label extension study and received treatments with only BOTOX 200 Units (N=174), was 264 days ( For all efficacy endpoints in the pivotal phase 3 studies, patients experienced consistent response with re-treatment (n=116). None of the 475 patients with analysed serum specimens developed neutralising antibodies after 1-2 treatments.

In patients with analysed specimens in the drug development program (including the open-label extension study), neutralising antibodies developed in 3 of 300 patients (1.0%) after receiving only BOTOX 200 Unit doses and school School, 5 of 258 patients (1.9%) after receiving at least one 300 Unit dose. Four of these eight patients continued to experience clinical benefit. Problem And Holland? Compared to the overall BOTOX treated population, patients who developed neutralising antibodies generally had shorter duration of response and consequently received treatments more frequently (see section 4.4). In the multiple sclerosis (MS) patients enrolled in the pivotal studies, the MS exacerbation annualised rate (i.e. number of write for me Adelphi, MS exacerbation events per patient year) was 0.23 in the 200 Unit dose group and 0.20 in the placebo group. Problem Solving? With repeated BOTOX treatments, including data from a long term study, the MS exacerbation annualised rate was 0.19 during each of the meaning of analytical thinking North Broward Preparatory first two BOTOX treatment cycles.

A placebo controlled, double-blind post-approval study was conducted in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with urinary incontinence due to neurogenic detrusor overactivity who were not adequately managed with at and Holland International Study least one anticholinergic agent and not catheterising at baseline. These patients were randomised to receive either 100 Units of BOTOX (n=66) or placebo (n=78). Significant improvements compared to placebo in the primary efficacy variable of change from baseline in daily frequency of incontinence episodes were observed for BOTOX (100 Units) at write the primary efficacy time point at week 6, including the percentage of dry patients. Significant improvements in urodynamic parameters, and Incontinence Quality of solving and Holland International Study, Life questionnaire (I-QOL), including avoidance limiting behaviour, psychosocial impact and social embarrassment were also observed. Critical Thinking Is SKODA? Results from the post-approval study are presented below: Primary and Secondary Endpoints at solving Study Baseline and School, Change from Baseline in problem and Holland Study Post-Approval Study of BOTOX 100 Units in MS patients not catheterising at baseline: Daily Frequency of St. Louis School, Urinary Incontinence* Mean Change at Week 2. Mean Change at Week 6 a. Mean Change at International Study Center Week 12. Maximum Cystometric Capacity (mL) Mean Change at Week 6 b. Maximum Detrusor Pressure during 1 st Involuntary Detrusor Contraction.

Mean Change at meaning of analytical thinking Broward Week 6 b. Incontinence Quality of problem International Study Center, Life Total Score c,d. Mean Change at Week 6 b. Mean Change at Week 12. * Percentage of dry patients (without incontinence) throughout week 6 was 53.0% (100 Unit BOTOX group) and 10.3% (placebo) a Primary endpoint. b Secondary endpoints. c I-QOL total score scale ranges from writing essay of Groningen (Study Group), 0 (maximum problem) to 100 (no problem at all). d The pre-specified minimally important difference (MID) for I-QOL total score was 11 points based on MID estimates of 4-11 points reported in neurogenic detrusor overactivity patients. The median duration of response in this study, based on patient request for re-treatment, was 362 days ( 52 weeks) for BOTOX 100 Unit dose group compared to 88 days ( 13 weeks) with placebo. SKIN AND SKIN APPENDAGE DISORDER. 537 patients with moderate to severe glabellar lines between the eyebrows seen at maximum frown have been included in clinical studies. Problem Solving Study Center? BOTOX injections significantly reduced the severity of glabellar lines seen at maximum frown for up to 4 months, as measured by the investigator assessment of glabellar line severity at argumentative essay Queen's College maximum frown and by subject's global assessment of change in solving and Holland appearance of of analytical Broward Preparatory School, his/her glabellar lines seen at maximum frown.

Improvement generally occurred within one week of treatment. None of the problem Study Center clinical endpoints included an objective evaluation of the writing University of Groningen Group) psychological impact. Thirty days after injection, 80% (325/405) of BOTOX-treated patients were considered by investigators as treatment responders (none or mild severity at maximum frown), compared to 3% (4/132) of placebo-treated patients. At this same timepoint, 89% (362/405) of BOTOX-treated patients felt they had a moderate or better improvement, compared to 7% (9/132) of placebo-treated patients. BOTOX injections also significantly reduced the severity of glabellar lines at rest. Of the 537 patients enrolled, 39% (210/537) had moderate to severe glabellar lines at rest (15% had no lines at rest). Of these, 74% (119/161) of BOTOX-treated patients were considered treatment responders (none or mild severity) thirty days after injection, compared with 20% (10/49) of solving and Holland, placebo-treated patients. There is limited phase 3 clinical data with BOTOX in patients older than 65 years. Only 6.0% (32/537) of subjects were 65 years old and writing St. Louis School, efficacy results obtained were lower in this population.

1362 patients with moderate to severe crow's feet lines seen at maximum smile, either alone (n=445, Study 191622-098) or also with moderate to severe glabellar lines seen at solving and Holland Study Center maximum frown (n=917, Study 191622-099), were enrolled. BOTOX injections significantly reduced the severity of crow's feet lines seen at maximum smile compared to essay placebo at all timepoints (p 0.001) for International up to meaning of analytical thinking 5 months (median 4 months). Improvement assessed by the investigator occurred within one week of treatment. This was measured by the proportion of solving and Holland Study, patients achieving a crow's feet lines severity rating of none or mild at maximum smile in both pivotal studies; until day 150 (end of write my essay for me University, study) in Study 191622-098 and solving and Holland International, day 120 (end of first treatment cycle) in Study 191622-099. For both investigator and subject assessments, the proportion of subjects achieving none or mild crow's feet lines severity seen at maximum smile was greater in patients with moderate crow's feet lines seen at maximum smile at baseline, compared to patients with severe crow's feet lines seen at maximum smile at argumentative research Queen's baseline. Table 1 summarises results at day 30, the problem solving timepoint of the primary efficacy endpoint.

In Study 191622-104 (extension to Study 191622-099), 101 patients previously randomised to placebo were enrolled to receive their first treatment at the 44 Units dose. Thinking Is SKODA AUTO? Patients treated with BOTOX had a statistically significant benefit in the primary efficacy endpoint compared to placebo at day 30 following their first active treatment. The response rate was similar to the 44 Units group at day 30 following first treatment in Study 191622-099. A total of 123 patients received 4 cycles of 44 Units BOTOX for combined crow's feet and solving and Holland Center, glabellar lines treatment. Critical Is SKODA University? Day 30: Investigator and problem solving and Holland Study, Patient Assessment of Crow's Feet Lines Seen at Maximum Smile - Responder Rates (% of Patients Achieving Crow's Feet Lines Severity Rating of None or Mild) (crow's feet lines) (crow's feet lines) (24 Units crow's feet lines; 20 Units glabellar lines) *p 0.001 (BOTOX vs placebo) Improvements from baseline in subject-assessment of the appearance of crow's feet lines seen at maximum smile were seen for BOTOX (24 Units and 44 Units) compared to placebo, at day 30 and at all timepoints following each treatment cycle in both pivotal studies (p0.001).

Treatment with BOTOX 24 Units also significantly reduced the for me Adelphi University severity of crow's feet lines at rest. Of the 528 patients treated, 63% (330/528) had moderate to solving and Holland International Study Center severe crow's feet lines at rest at baseline. Argumentative? Of these, 58% (192/330) of BOTOX-treated patients were considered treatment responders (none or mild severity) thirty days after injection, compared with 11% (39/352) of placebo-treated patients. Improvements in subject's self-assessment of age and attractiveness were also seen for BOTOX (24 Units and 44 Units) compared to solving and Holland International placebo using the Facial Line Outcomes (FLO-11) questionnaire, at the primary timepoint of day 30 (p0.001) and at all subsequent timepoints in both pivotal studies. In the pivotal studies, 3.9% (53/1362) of patients were older than 65 years of age. Patients in this age group had a treatment response as assessed by the investigator, of argumentative essay Queen's College, 36% (at day 30) for BOTOX (24 Units and 44 Units).When analysed by age groups of #8804;50 years and 50 years, both populations demonstrated statistically significant improvements compared to placebo. Treatment response for International BOTOX 24 Units, as assessed by the investigator, was lower in AUTO University the group of subjects 50 years of age than those #8804;50 years of age (42.0% and 71.2%, respectively). Overall BOTOX treatment response for crow's feet lines seen at maximum smile is problem and Holland Study, lower (60%) than that observed with treatment for argumentative essay Queen's glabellar lines seen at maximum frown (80%).

916 patients (517 patients at 24 Units and 399 patients at 44 Units) treated with BOTOX had specimens analysed for antibody formation. Problem And Holland Center? No patients developed the presence of neutralising antibodies. a) General characteristics of the argumentative research essay Queen's active substance: Classical absorption, distribution, biotransformation and elimination studies on the active substance have not been performed due to the extreme toxicity of botulinum toxin type A. b) Characteristics in patients: Human ADME studies have not been performed due to problem International Study the nature of the product. It is believed that little systemic distribution of therapeutic doses of BOTOX occurs. BOTOX is probably metabolised by proteases and the molecular components recycled through normal metabolic pathways. Non-clinical data based on conventional studies of safety pharmacology, repeated dose toxicity and essay writing companies, genotoxicity reveal no special hazard for humans other than exaggerated pharmacological effects predictable at high doses, given the neurotoxic nature of BOTOX. Carcinogenicity studies have not been conducted.

In monkeys receiving a single intramuscular (i.m.) injection of BOTOX, the No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) ranged from problem International, 4 to critical thinking is SKODA AUTO University 24 Units/kg. The i.m. LD 50 was reported to be 39 Units/kg. Toxicity on repeated injection. In three different studies (six months in rats; 20 weeks in juvenile monkeys; 1 year in monkeys) where the animals received i.m. injections, the Study NOEL was at the following respective BOTOX dosage levels: 4 Units/kg, 8 Units/kg and 4 Units/kg. The main systemic effect was a transient decrease in write University body weight gain. There was no indication of a cumulative effect in the animal studies when BOTOX was given at dosage intervals of 1 month or greater. Decrease in bodyweight was observed following a single intradetrusor injection of 10 Units/kg BOTOX in rats. To simulate inadvertent injection, a single dose of BOTOX ( 7 Units/kg) was administered into the prostatic urethra and proximal rectum, the seminal vesicle and urinary bladder wall, or the uterus of monkeys ( 3 Units/kg) without adverse clinical effects. However, bladder stones have been observed in monkeys given a single dose of BOTOX to International Study Center the prostatic urethra and proximal rectum, and in a repeated dose intraprostatic study.

Due to anatomical differences the School clinical relevance of these findings is unknown. In a 9 month repeat dose intradetrusor study (4 injections), eyelid ptosis was observed at 24 Units/kg, and mortality was observed at doses #8805;24 Units/kg. Center? No adverse effects were observed in monkeys at 12 Units/kg, which corresponds to a 3-fold greater exposure than the Justin-Siena High recommended clinical dose of 200 Units for urinary incontinence due to neurogenic detrusor overactivity (based on a 50 kg person). BOTOX was shown not to cause ocular or dermal irritation, or give rise to toxicity when injected into problem solving and Holland, the vitreous body in rabbits. Allergic or inflammatory reactions in the area of the injection sites are rarely observed after BOTOX administration. However, formation of haematoma may occur.

When pregnant mice and rats were injected intramuscularly during the period of organogenesis, the developmental NOEL of BOTOX was at essay writing companies School 4 Units/kg. Solving And Holland Study? Reductions in ossification were observed at 8 and 16 Units/kg (mice) and reduced ossification of the hyoid bone at 16 Units/kg (rats). Reduced foetal body weights were observed at 8 and 16 Units/kg (rats). In a range-finding study in rabbits, daily injections at dosages of 0.5 Units/kg/day (days 6 to 18 of critical thinking is SKODA AUTO, gestation), and 4 and solving Study, 6 Units/kg (administered on critical thinking is SKODA University, days 6 and 13 of gestation), caused death and abortions among surviving dams. External malformations were observed in one foetus each in the 0.125 Units/kg/day and the 2 Units/kg dosage groups. Problem And Holland Study? The rabbit appears to be a very sensitive species to BOTOX treatment. Impairment of fertility and reproduction. Argumentative Research Essay Queen's College? The reproductive NOEL following i.m. injection of BOTOX was 4 Units/kg in male rats and problem International Center, 8 Units/kg in female rats. Critical Is SKODA? Higher dosages were associated with dose-dependent reductions in fertility. Provided impregnation occurred, there were no adverse effects on problem solving and Holland Center, the numbers or viability of the embryos sired or conceived by treated male or female rats.

Pre- and essay School, post-natal developmental effects. In female rats, the reproductive NOEL was 16 Units/kg. The developmental NOEL was 4 Units/kg. BOTOX showed antigenicity in mice only in the presence of adjuvant. BOTOX was found to be slightly antigenic in the guinea pig. No haemolysis was detected up to 100 Units/ml of solving and Holland Study Center, BOTOX in normal human blood. In the absence of compatibility studies, this medicinal product should not be mixed with other medicinal products. Essay Of Groningen Group)? After reconstitution, stability has been demonstrated for 24 hours at 2°C 8°C. From a microbiological point of view, the product should be used immediately.

If not used immediately, in-use storage times and conditions prior to use are the responsibility of the problem and Holland International Study user and would normally not be longer than 24 hours at 2°C to 8°C (see also section 6.6). Store in a refrigerator (2°C-8°C), or store in a freezer (at or below -5°C). For storage conditions of the reconstituted medicinal product see section 6.3. Clear glass vial, with rubber stopper and tamper-proof aluminium seal, containing white powder for solution for of analytical injection. And Holland Center? #8226; Carton comprising one 100 Allergan Unit vial and package leaflet. #8226; Packs containing one, two, three or six cartons. Not all pack sizes may be marketed. BOTOX is reconstituted prior to use with sterile unpreserved normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride for injection). For Me Adelphi University? It is good practice to perform vial reconstitution and syringe preparation over and Holland, plastic-lined paper towels to catch any spillage. An appropriate amount of diluent (see dilution table below) is drawn up into expository essay of Groningen (Study, a syringe. The exposed portion of the rubber septum of the vial is cleaned with alcohol (70%) prior to insertion of the problem solving and Holland International Study needle.

Since BOTOX is write my essay for me University, denatured by bubbling or similar violent agitation, the diluent should be injected gently into solving and Holland, the vial. Discard the argumentative research vial if a vacuum does not pull the problem and Holland Study diluent into the vial. Reconstituted BOTOX is a clear colourless to slightly yellow solution free of particulate matter. When reconstituted, BOTOX may be stored in a refrigerator (2-8°C) for up to 24 hours prior to essay College use. After this period used or unused vials should be discarded. Each vial is for single use only. Care should be taken to use the correct diluent volume for solving and Holland Study Center the presentation chosen to prevent accidental overdose. If different vial sizes of BOTOX are being used as part of one injection procedure, care should be taken to school School use the correct amount of diluent when reconstituting a particular number of Center, units per 0.1 ml. Coursework Justin-Siena High? The amount of diluent varies between BOTOX 50 Allergan Units, BOTOX 100 Allergan Units and BOTOX 200 Allergan Units. Each syringe should be labelled accordingly. Problem And Holland? Dilution table for BOTOX 50 , 100 and 200 Allergan Units vial size for all indications except bladder disorders: Amount of research College, diluent (sterile unpreserved normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride for injection)) added in a 50 Unit vial.

Amount of and Holland, diluent (sterile unpreserved normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride for injection)) added in a 100 Unit vial. Amount of diluent (sterile unpreserved normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride for injection)) added in a 200 Unit vial. It is recommended that a 100 Unit or two 50 Unit vials are used for convenience of reconstitution. Dilution instructions using two 50 Unit vials: #8226; Reconstitute two 50 Unit vials of BOTOX each with 5 ml of sterile unpreserved normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride for injection) and mix the vials gently. My Essay Adelphi? #8226; Draw the 5 ml from each of the vials into problem solving International Study Center, a single 10 ml syringe. This will result in School a 10 ml syringe containing a total of 100 Units of problem solving International Study, reconstituted BOTOX. Use immediately after reconstitution in the syringe. Dispose of any unused saline. Dilution instructions using a 100 Unit vial: #8226; Reconstitute a 100 Unit vial of BOTOX with 10 ml of sterile unpreserved normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride for injection) and mix gently. #8226; Draw the 10 ml from the vial into a 10 ml syringe. This will result in a 10 ml syringe containing a total of meaning North Broward Preparatory School, 100 Units of and Holland Center, reconstituted BOTOX.

Use immediately after reconstitution in the syringe. Dispose of any unused saline. Writing Companies St. Louis School? Dilution instructions using a 200 Unit vial: #8226; Reconstitute a 200 Unit vial of BOTOX with 8 ml of sterile unpreserved normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride for injection) and mix gently. #8226; Draw 4 ml from the vial into and Holland International Study, a 10 ml syringe. #8226; Complete the reconstitution by adding 6 ml of argumentative essay Queen's, sterile unpreserved normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride for injection) into problem Center, the 10 ml syringe and mix gently. This will result in a 10 ml syringe containing a total of 100 Units of school coursework High School, reconstituted BOTOX. Use immediately after reconstitution in the syringe. Dispose of and Holland International, any unused saline. This product is for thinking is SKODA AUTO single use only and any unused reconstituted product should be disposed of. Urinary incontinence due to problem solving International Study Center neurogenic detrusor overactivity: It is recommended that a 200 Unit vial or two 100 Unit vials are used for convenience of reconstitution . Dilution instructions using four 50 Unit vials:

#8226; Reconstitute four 50 Unit vials of BOTOX, each with 3 ml of meaning North School, sterile unpreserved normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride for injection) and mix the vials gently. #8226; Draw 3 ml from the first vial and 1 ml from the second vial into solving and Holland International, one 10 ml syringe. #8226; Draw 3 ml from the third vial and 1 ml from the fourth vial into critical thinking is SKODA, a second 10 ml syringe. And Holland International Study? #8226; Draw the remaining 2 ml from the second and fourth vials into a third 10 ml syringe. #8226; Complete the argumentative research essay Queen's College reconstitution by problem Study adding 6 ml of sterile unpreserved normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride for injection) into each of the three 10 ml syringes, and mix gently. This will result in three 10 ml syringes containing a total of 200 Units of reconstituted BOTOX. Use immediately after reconstitution in writing expository University of Groningen (Study Group) the syringe. Dispose of any unused saline. Dilution instructions using two 100 Unit vials: #8226; Reconstitute two 100 Unit vials of BOTOX, each with 6 ml of solving Study Center, sterile unpreserved normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride for research essay Queen's injection) and mix the vials gently. #8226; Draw 4 ml from problem International Center, each vial into write for me Adelphi, each of two 10 ml syringes. Problem Solving And Holland International Study? #8226; Draw the remaining 2 ml from each vial into a third 10 ml syringe. #8226; Complete the reconstitution by adding 6 ml of sterile unpreserved normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride for injection) into each of the 10 ml syringes, and mix gently. This will result in three 10 ml syringes containing a total of argumentative research College, 200 Units of reconstituted BOTOX. Study? Use immediately after reconstitution in the syringe. Dispose of any unused saline. Dilution instructions using a 200 Unit vial: #8226; Reconstitute a 200 Unit vial of critical is SKODA AUTO University, BOTOX with 6 ml of problem solving International, sterile unpreserved normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride for injection) and my essay for me Adelphi University, mix the vials gently. Solving International? #8226; Draw 2 ml from the vial into each of three 10 ml syringes. #8226; Complete the reconstitution by adding 8 ml of sterile unpreserved normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride for injection) into each of the 10 ml syringes, and mix gently. This will result in three 10 ml syringes containing a total of 200 Units of is SKODA, reconstituted BOTOX.

Use immediately after reconstitution in International Study the syringe. Dispose of any unused saline. The 'unit' by which the meaning North Broward Preparatory potency of preparations of problem International, BOTOX is measured should be used to calculate dosages of write Adelphi, BOTOX only and solving and Holland International Center, is not transferable to other preparations of botulinum toxin. For safe disposal, unused vials should be reconstituted with a small amount of write my essay for me Adelphi, water then autoclaved. Any used vials, syringes, and spillages etc. should be autoclaved, or the residual BOTOX inactivated using dilute hypochlorite solution (0.5%).

Any unused product or waste material should be disposed of in solving and Holland accordance with local requirements. Argumentative Essay? The Parkway, Marlow, Bucks SL7 1YL, UK. Address : Marlow International, The Parkway, Marlow, Bucks, SL7 1YL, UK. Telephone : +44 (0)1628 494444. Fax : +44 (0)1628 494449.

Medical Information Direct Line : +44 (0)1628 494026.

Order Your Own Writing Help Now -
A great place | Holland International Study Centrepdf5 Кб

Long Essay On Self Help Is The Best Help. Write my essay” concern? We can solve it now! You need someone to write an essay for you strictly by Study the deadline. We can do it faster! We upload works before the deadline and you don`t even notice it! Drinking your coffee on Sunday, you check your e-mail – and then BOOM: your paper was uploaded two days before the deadline. Awesome, isn`t it? You want someone to write essay for you. That`s all. Write For Me University? No strings attached.

Like “I pay the money-you write my essay” kind of problem and Holland International Study, deal. Research Essay Queen's College? But the solving and Holland writers start asking you so many questions: “How many words do you want in your essay?”, “Could you please specify your requirements regarding the structure?” or “Do I have to use 3 Ebert`s quotes in this film review?”. You may wonder why they need it. The answer may be surprising: to make your essay look and sound better! So feel free to share all the writing expository of Groningen (Study Group) details for writing your paper. You are worried that someone will find out that you have been using writing service. For us, you can be “Dear Customer”, no real name is needed.

We call it privacy policy. Problem Solving International? Your writer will never learn your name. Imagine, they even don’t know who they write papers for. Best security policy, ever! Oftentimes, the prices bite. But we write essay at a medium price.

Lower than average. “Can you write my essay for me?” question presupposes a really expensive answer. You know that because you have checked different services. A number of excellent writers at our company is ready to create your paper and it won`t cost you a fortune. There is nothing wrong with it. You will still get the quality up to the mark. The same writer will revise your paper as many times as you need two weeks after the work is completed. If you need it, of course. Meaning Thinking North? You are welcome to ask for as many amendments as you need.

We will give you solid discounts because loyalty is what we value. Order top writers and problem solving and Holland International Study, get personalized approach from the best researchers in the business. Experts who write essays better than you could ever imagine. Don’t think two times before you ask us to “write my essay for me”. School? We can ease your college life by writing you an essay that will leave your professor speechless in a good sense. Moreover, you get a personal writer. And Holland Study? He will probably ask you to upload as many instructions as you have. Writing St. Louis School? Like notes of lectures and professor`s recommendations.

He will send you messages regarding the structure. He will ask you to look through the draft or the outline. Solving International? He won`t let you think that he forgot about your assignment. Just eat your yoghurt or drink coffee in a peaceful place, while your essay is being crafted according to all the requirements. All the Justin-Siena School papers you get at samedayessay.org are meant for research purposes only. The papers are not supposed to be submitted for academic credit. should be there!

Terms conditions Privacy policy Referral program. Please read these Terms and problem solving and Holland Center, Conditions (“Terms” and/or “Terms and Conditions”) carefully before using the samedayessay.org website (“Website”). Your access to essay writing companies School and use of Website are conditioned on your full acceptance and compliance with these Terms and problem solving International Study, Conditions and write my essay for me University, this Website Privacy Policy, which are published at samedayessay.org and which are incorporated herein by reference (“Privacy Policy”). These Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy are applied to all visitors, users and problem, others who access or use this Website. By accessing or using this Website, you agree to North Broward be bound by these Terms and Conditions and International Study Center, Privacy Policy. Thinking Is SKODA AUTO? If you disagree with these Terms and Conditions and/or Privacy Policy or any part of solving and Holland Center, them, you must not use this Website. Capitalized terms defined in these Terms and Conditions shall have no other meaning but set forward in this section.

The following terminology is applied to these Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy and Refund and Revision Policy: “Client”, “You” and “Your” refers to argumentative Queen's you, the person accessing this Website and accepting these Terms and solving and Holland International Study Center, Conditions. “We”, “Us” and “Ourselves” refers to samedayessay.org website. Any use of the writing companies St. Louis School above terminology or other words in the singular, plural, capitalization and/or he/she or they, are taken as interchangeable and therefore as referring to same. By using our Services, you represent and warrant that (a) all registration information you submit to samedayessay.org is truthful and accurate; (b) you will maintain the accuracy of such information; (c) you are 18 years of age or older and/or have full legal capacity to enter into legally binding relations; and (d) your use of the problem and Holland International Services does not violate any applicable law, regulation, and/or your college/university/school rules. Your profile may be deleted and Services provided to you may be terminated without warning, if we believe that you are less than 18 years of age and/or do not have full legal capacity to enter into writing essay (Study legally binding relations. Subjected to full compliance with these Terms and Conditions, samedayessay.org shall provide academic writing services as described more fully on the Website (“Services”). Services may include, but not be limited to, providing our Clients with dissertations, research papers, book reports, term papers, and other types of assignments written by problem solving samedayessay.org team (“Paper”) which are intended for essay writing research/reference purposes and for your personal use only. Services may include editing, proofreading, paraphrasing, or formatting existing papers of our Clients. Please note that rewriting an existing paper that contains 40% or more plagiarized content may qualify as providing you with a custom Paper and shall be charged for accordingly. Please note that Services may be provided only to the users who submit an solving International Study Center, appropriate order form at the Website and samedayessay.org may charge fees for such Services. The Services are provided according to the provisions of these Terms and Conditions and the specific commercial provisions and school coursework High, policies (including Privacy Policy, Refund Policy, etc.) as detailed on the Website, and these provisions and Study Center, policies may be amended or changed from coursework, time to time.

The format of the Papers we provide: 12 point Times New Roman; Bibliography on a separate page; Approximately 250 words per page; One inch margin top, bottom, left, right; Title and Reference pages are free of problem solving International Study Center, charge. In case Client needs a single-spaced Paper they are to pay a double fee.

The standard Paper formatting includes a Title page , main content of the Paper, and a Reference page. Thinking School? Note that you pay only for the main content of the Paper, while a Title page and a Reference page are provided free of charge. samedayessay.org reserves the right to problem solving use any relevant materials available, such as books, journals, newspapers, interviews, online publications, etc., unless the Client indicates some specific sources to be used. PLACING AN ORDER. When placing your order, you must provide accurate and complete information. Research Essay College? You are solely responsible for any possible consequences and misunderstandings, in case you provide us with inaccurate and/or incorrect and/or unfaithful information. Please be advised that you will be asked to give final confirmation to the instructions you provide in order details. Your Paper instructions should be confirmed in your Order Tracking Area within 3 hours after placing your order (and within 1 hour for orders with urgency less than 24 hours). Orders without instructions will not be worked on and may be delayed and you accept sole responsibility for and Holland such delay. Essay Writing Companies St. Louis School? samedayessay.org guarantees that the and Holland International Center delivered Paper will meet only confirmed requirements. You must not change the instructions once you have confirmed them. School School? Any alterations to confirmed instructions are considered as additional order, thereby requiring additional payment. All payments are due upon receipt.

If the problem solving International Center payment is companies, not received or payment method is declined, the Client forfeits of Services. All fees are exclusive of all taxes and/or levies, and/or duties imposed by taxing authorities, and solving and Holland International Study Center, you shall be responsible for payment of all such taxes and/or levies, and/or duties. Argumentative Queen's College? You agree to pay any such taxes that might be applicable to your use of the and Holland International Study Center Services and payments made by you under these Terms. If at any time you contact your bank or credit card company and research essay College, decline or otherwise reject the solving and Holland Study charge of any payment, this act will be considered as a breach of your obligation hereunder and your use of the Services will be automatically terminated. Use of stolen credit card and/or any credit card fraud is considered to be a serious crime. samedayessay.org closely cooperates with our payment provider to prevent and Justin-Siena School, fight online fraud. In case of any online fraud, appropriate state authorities will be contacted immediately. By doing a chargeback, you agree to give up all your rights to the Paper automatically. At the same time, you authorize samedayessay.org to publish the completed Paper and start the problem authorship procedure that will allow us to determine if you have used any parts of the Paper. The procedure may include contacting your school officials and/or posting your full details along with the completed Paper online. samedayessay.org reserves the right to change its prices at any time in its sole discretion and such changes or modifications shall be posted online at the Website and become effective immediately without need for further notice to any Client and/or user.

We care about our Clients and are always looking for ways to offer them the best value for money. One method we use is a discount system. samedayessay.org, at critical is SKODA, its sole discretion, shall have the right to provide our Clients with discount programs as described more fully and solving International Study Center, published on the Website. According to our loyalty program, you earn back 10% of your total bill in Points (1 currency unit (inter alia USD/ EUR/ GBP etc.) = 1 Point) after you make your first order. Your Points are accumulated on your Credit Balance. Writing Expository Essay University (Study Group)? “Credit Balance” is an account for Points of a Client which can be used for future purchases on the Website exclusively. You can use your Points for your next purchases on the Website exclusively. Your Points cannot be refunded.

The discount may be obtained by the use of the promo code. The amount of Points added to solving and Holland International the Credit Balance is calculated on the basis of the order price excluding the applied discount (if any). Later, 5% of every next order (not including credits) is added to your Credit Balance. samedayessay.org will issue a refund to you only according to these Terms. samedayessay.org offers a 14-day money back period for Papers less than 20 pages and a 30-day period for Papers more than 20 pages (”Refund Period”). Refund Period begins on argumentative research Queen's College, the date of Client`s order deadline and expires on the last day of the Refund Period. In case you are not satisfied with any of the Services, you can submit a refund request according to these Terms within the Refund Period. Problem Solving And Holland? Once the Refund Period elapses, samedayessay.org will not refund any amounts paid. If the order is not completed and/or the Paper is not downloaded or delivered in its complete form by or to write for me you, the full refund is issued at any time. In the and Holland Study Center event of order cancellation, the funds will be debited back only to the account of the initial payment within 5-7 business days from the time of cancellation request. In other case samedayessay.org assesses refund requests on a case-by-case basis as there are usually unique reasons as to why a refund request is made. Please note that if you request a refund, we may require documented proof that the quality of essay companies School, your order is low (e.g., scan copy of your instructor’s feedback, plagiarism report, etc.).

Should you feel it necessary to make a refund request, we will immediately forward your order to our Quality Assurance Department. After comparing their findings with the solving International reasons for dissatisfaction, the necessary corrective actions will be taken. Any refund request must be made within the Refund Period. In case samedayessay.org reimburses the money because of mistakes or some irrelevance to the initial instructions, our Quality Assurance Department, at my essay Adelphi University, its sole discretion, evaluates the problem International quality of the writing University (Study Paper and problem and Holland International, refunds an amount comparable to the percentage of incorrect content in the Paper and mistakes present in it. samedayessay.org provides various methods of research Queen's College, contact (i.e. Solving Study Center? email, telephone, message board, and meaning North School, live chat) to facilitate communication between you, us and the writer assigned to complete an order. Using any of these methods, our Customer Support Center is available to solving and Holland Study Center you at any time and will respond to any refund request or other issue promptly. School Justin-Siena School? However, if such a request is problem solving and Holland Center, not received using any of the expository essay of Groningen (Study aforementioned methods within the Refund Period, samedayessay.org will not be obliged to honor or consider the above said request.

Should the problem Center Paper delivery be delayed due to coursework unexpected circumstances, from the side of samedayessay.org, we may provide compensation for the breach of the order deadline in the form of solving International Study, a credit or a discount to be used towards your next order with us. Meaning Preparatory? Please be informed that delivery time deviation is not a subject to refund. Any revision request or complaint in regards to a Paper that samedayessay.org has provided must be made within the revision period (“Revision Period”). samedayessay.org offers a 14-day Revision Period for Papers less than 20 pages and a 30-day period for Papers more than 20 pages. Revision Period begins on the date of Client`s order deadline and expires on the last day of the solving and Holland Revision Period. After that point, no revision and/or complaint will be accepted. samedayessay.org recognizes that orders vary in my essay Adelphi University, size and Center, complexity; as a result, dissertation, thesis and/or other sufficiently large assignment may be granted 30-day Revision Period. Sufficiency in the size of the essay University Group) Paper will be determined by samedayessay.org in its sole discretion. In case a request for revision is not submitted within the Revision Period, samedayessay.org tacitly accepts that the problem International Center Client is satisfied with the University Paper and requires no further actions to be taken in regards to the Paper unless extra payment is provided or a new order is placed. Upon receiving your completed assignment you are entitled to a free revision should the Paper fail to meet your instructions or defined the requirements in any way. When this is the and Holland International Center case, you are entitled to request as many revisions as may be required to argumentative essay Queen's make the Paper consistent and compliant with your instructions.

During the Revision Period the request for revision may be made at any time. All revisions must be based on the original order instructions. If at the time of the revision request you provide new, additional, or differing instructions, this will be interpreted as an application for new Paper and thus, will require an additional payment. Furthermore, should you request a revision after the Revision Period, it will also be considered as a new order requiring an additional payment. We may require you to supply us with personal identifying information, and we may also legally consult other sources to obtain information about you. And Holland Study? By accepting these Terms and Conditions, you authorize us to make any inquiries we consider necessary to validate the information that you provide us with. We may do this directly or by verifying your information against writing expository (Study third party databases; or through other sources.

Essentially, verification procedure involves, inter alia, confirming that the order is problem International, authentic and that the cardholder is aware of charges by placing a phone call to them, and in certain cases by requesting some additional documents to be submitted for essay College verification to our Risk Department. Problem? In order to ensure timely delivery of Queen's College, your order, this procedure must be completed quickly and without delay. Therefore, it is vital to International provide accurate and valid phone numbers. Failure to verify an order may result in order cancellation or the order being placed on hold. You consent to my essay our processing your personal information for solving International Center the purposes of providing the Services, including for verification purposes as set out research College herein. You also consent to and Holland Study the use of such data for communicating with you, for statutory and essay, accounting purposes. And Holland International Study? You acknowledge that you have read and consented to essay companies samedayessay.org's Privacy Policy. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY. samedayessay.org will not be liable to you in relation to the contents of, the Study Center use of, or otherwise in connection with, this Website: for failure to learn the argumentative research essay material covered by the Paper; and. for your final grade; and. for the outcome or consequences of submission the Paper to any academic institution; and.

excludes all liability for problem International Center damages arising out of or in my essay for me Adelphi University, connection with your use of this Website. The latter includes, without limitation, damage caused to your computer, computer software, systems and programs and solving and Holland International, the data thereon, or any other direct or indirect, consequential and incidental damages. The Paper provided to writing companies St. Louis School you by samedayessay.org remains our property and is the solving International Study subject to copyright and other intellectual property rights under local and international laws conventions. The Paper is argumentative, intended for your personal use only and it may not be used, copied, reproduced, distributed, transmitted, broadcast, displayed, sold, licensed, or otherwise exploited for any other purposes without our prior written consent. You agree not to engage in the use, copying, or distribution of Papers other than expressly permitted herein. We post Clients` testimonials on problem solving International Study Center, our Website which may contain personal information (first name or initials). School High School? Hereby by accessing or using this Website, you provide us with your consent to post your first name/initials along with your testimonial on our Website. We ensure our posting these testimonials does not interfere with your confidentiality.

If you wish to request the removal of your testimonial, you may contact us at solving International Study, [emailprotected] NOTIFICATION OF CHANGES. samedayessay.org reserves the right to school coursework School change these Terms and Conditions at any time and your continued use of the solving and Holland International Website will signify your acceptance of any adjustment, improvements and/or alterations to these Terms and Conditions. You are, therefore, advised to re-read these Terms and Conditions on a regular basis. This web site is owned and operated by Viatta Business Ltd. HEXO+ Self-Flying Camera Drone, with a suggested retail price of $1,249.00 USD («Main prize»). St. Louis? FreePage (single use) SMS inform (single use) Plagiarism Report (single use) 50$ to problem International your bonus balance which you can use in 365 days 100$ to your bonus balance which you can use in 365 days. 2. Promotional Period. The promotion begins on 7.18.2017, at 9:00 am and ends on 7.28.2017 at 10:00 pm.

This Privacy Policy (“Policy”) describes how information about of analytical North Broward Preparatory You is collected, used and disclosed and problem solving and Holland Center, provides other important privacy information, describes when and how we may change this Policy, and coursework Justin-Siena School, tells You how to contact us with any questions or comments. We collect information about You and International, computer(s) You use when You use our Services or otherwise interact with us. “Personal Information” means information that we directly associate with a specific person or entity (for example: name; addresses; telephone numbers; email address; payment information; device location etc.). “Client”, “User”, “You” and “Your” refers to you, the person accessing this Website and accepting these Privacy Policy. Any use of the argumentative essay Queen's College above terminology or other words in the singular, plural, capitalization and/or he/she or they, are taken as interchangeable and problem and Holland International Center, therefore as referring to same.

HOW INFORMATION ABOUT YOU IS COLLECTED. We collect information about You in three primary ways: Information You Provide. We collect information that You provide to us when You apply for write my essay for me University and use and/or purchase our Services or otherwise communicate with us. For example, some of the ways You may provide information to us include: When You purchase our Services, the payment system will require your personal, contact, billing and credit information. When You establish or modify Your user account online, We may collect user identification information, passwords, and/or security question responses that You will use for future sign-on. When You interact with our Customer Service representatives, enter information on our Website, submit survey responses, or pay for problem solving Services, we may also collect Personal Information and other information. We may monitor and record phone calls, e-mails, live chats, or other communications between You and our Customer Service representatives or other employees or representatives. Information We Collect Automatically. We automatically collect a variety of information associated with Your use of school, our Services.

Each time You visit the problem solving and Holland International Study Center Website, Personal Information is automatically gathered. Research Queen's? In general, this information does not identify You personally. And Holland International Center? Examples of automatically collected personal information include, but are not limited to: IP address, Collection Date, Publisher Name, Connection Speed, Day of School, Week Time of Day (hour), Language settings, Country, City (relating to problem IP address, if available). For example, some of the of analytical thinking Broward Preparatory ways we may automatically collect information include: Cookies and similar technologies. A “cookie” is a small text file that a web site can place on problem and Holland, Your computer's hard drive in order, for writing expository University (Study example, to problem and Holland International Center collect information about Your activities on writing essay University of Groningen, the Website. Problem Solving Center? The cookie transmits this information back to the Website's computer, which, generally speaking, is the only computer that can read it.

We need to use cookies on the Website to argumentative research enhance the solving Study user experience and avoid multiple logins or password authentication requests. We may use, or we may engage third-parties to use on our behalf, cookies or similar web tags (small data text files placed on your computer or device) or similar technologies to school High identify Your computer or device and record Your preferences and other data so that our Website can personalize Your visit(s), see which areas and features of our Website are popular, and improve our Website and Your experience. Depending upon Your computer, You may be able to set Your browser(s) to reject cookies or delete cookies, but that may result in International Center, the loss of essay writing companies School, some functionality on the Website. We may also use web beacons (small graphic images on a web page or an HTML e-mail) to monitor interaction with our websites or e-mails. Web beacons are generally invisible because they are very small (only 1-by-1 pixel) and the same color as the background of the web page or e-mail message. Web Browsing Activity.

When accessing our Website, We automatically collect certain information about Your computer and Your visit, such as your IP address, browser type, date and time, the web page You visited before visiting our Website, Your activities and purchases on our Website, and problem Study, other analytical information associated with the Website. Information From Other Sources. We may also obtain information about You from other sources. Write My Essay Adelphi University? For example, We may receive credit information from third-party sources before initiating Your service. Problem And Holland Center? We may also purchase or obtain Personal Information (for example, e-mail lists, postal mail lists, demographic and marketing data) from school coursework School, others. HOW WE USE INFORMATION WE COLLECT ABOUT YOU. We use the information We collect for a variety of and Holland International, business purposes, such as: To provide and bill for Services You purchase; To deliver and confirm Services You obtain from us;

To verify Your identity and maintain a record of Your transactions and interactions with us; To provide customer services to You; To create, modify, improve, enhance, remove or fix our Services and their performance; To identify and suggest products or services that might interest You; To make internal business decisions about current and meaning School, future Service offerings; To provide You customized user experiences, including personalized Services offerings; To protect our rights, interests, safety and problem solving Study, property and essay companies St. Louis School, that of our customers, service providers and and Holland International Study, other third parties; and. To comply with law or as required for legal purposes. We may use Personal Information for investigations or prevention of fraud or network abuse. We may use information we collect to contact You about essay companies our and/or third-party products, services, and offers that We believe You may find of interest. We may contact You by telephone, postal mail, e-mail, or other methods.

You may see advertisements when You visit our Website. And Holland International Study Center? We may help advertisers better reach our customers by critical thinking AUTO University providing certain customer information, including geographic information, language preferences or demographic information obtained from other companies. This information is solving and Holland International Study Center, used by advertisers to determine which ads may be more relevant to You. However, we do not share Personal Information outside of our corporate family for advertising purposes without Your consent. WHEN WE SHARE INFORMATION COLLECTED ABOUT YOU. We do not sell, license, rent, or otherwise provide Your Personal Information to essay Queen's unaffiliated third-parties (parties outside our corporate family) without Your consent. Problem Solving Study Center? We may, however, disclose Your information to unaffiliated third-parties as follows: With Your Consent. We may disclose Personal Information about You to third-parties with Your consent.

We may obtain Your consent in writing; online, through “click-through” agreements; when You accept the terms of School, disclosures for certain Services; orally, when You interact with our customer service representatives. We encourage You not to problem solving and Holland share Your password. If You provide Your user account password and/or security question responses to third parties they will have access to Your Personal Information when they access Your user account with Your account password. To Our Service Providers. We may disclose information to third-party vendors and critical thinking, partners who complete transactions or perform services on our behalf (for example, credit/debit card processing, billing, customer service, auditing, and problem solving and Holland Study, marketing). In a Business Transfer. We may sell, disclose, or transfer information about You as part of argumentative essay Queen's, a corporate business transaction, such as a merger or acquisition, joint venture, corporate reorganization, financing, or sale of solving and Holland Study Center, company assets, or in essay companies St. Louis, the unlikely event of problem and Holland Study Center, insolvency, bankruptcy, or receivership, in which such information could be transferred to third-parties as a business asset in the transaction. For Legal Process Protection. We may disclose Personal Information, and other information about essay writing companies School You, or Your communications, where we have a good faith belief that access, use, preservation or disclosure of problem International Study Center, such information is reasonably necessary: to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, legal process or enforceable governmental request; to enforce or apply agreements, or initiate, render, bill, and collect for services and products (including to collection agencies in order to obtain payment for our products and Justin-Siena School, services); to protect our rights or interests, or property or safety or that of others; in connection with claims, disputes, or litigation – in solving and Holland, court or elsewhere; to facilitate or verify the appropriate calculation of taxes, fees, or other obligations; or. in an emergency situation.

We may provide information that does not identify You personally to write for me University third-parties for marketing, advertising or other purposes. HOW WE STORE AND PROTECT THE INFORMATION COLLECTED ABOUT YOU. Protecting Your Information. We use a variety of solving Study, physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards to protect Personal Information from meaning of analytical thinking North Preparatory School, unauthorized access, use, or disclosure while it is under our control. Unfortunately, no data transmission over solving and Holland Study Center, the internet can be guaranteed to be completely secure. As a result, although we will utilize such measures, we do not guarantee You against the loss, misuse, or alteration of Personal Information under our control, and You provide Personal Information to essay companies St. Louis School us at Your own risk. Solving And Holland Study Center? You should always take care with how You handle and disclose your Personal Information and should avoid sending Personal Information through insecure e-mail, social networks or other internet channels. Retention and write my essay for me, Disposal. We retain information only for as long as we have a business or tax need or as applicable laws, regulations and/or government orders allow. When we dispose of Personal Information, we use reasonable procedures designed to erase or render it unreadable (for example, shredding documents and wiping electronic media). PRIVACY POLICY UPDATES.

How We Communicate Changes to Study This Policy. We may update this Policy at any time to provide updates to or clarification of our practices. If we make changes we may provide You with additional notice (such as adding a statement to coursework School the homepage of our Website or sending You a notification). You should refer to problem Study Center this Policy often for the latest information and the effective date of coursework Justin-Siena High School, any changes. This web site is problem solving and Holland Study Center, owned and operated by Viatta Business Ltd . A Partner is an individual who refers customers.

A Referral is an individual who requests a service via the referral link given by a Partner. With the first order, a Referral acquires a 15% discount on my essay Adelphi University, the order, while a Partner receives $50 to solving and Holland Study Center the Referral Balance. With further purchases, a Partner earns 5% of the Referral’s total order price. All money earned with the Referral Program is stored on your Referral Balance. A Partner can transfer the meaning North School money to the Bonus Balance and use it to purchase a service.

It is possible to transfer the Study sum to the Partner’s PayPal account (no less than $20).

Pay for Essay and Get the Best Paper You Need -
A great place | Holland International Study Centrepdf5 Кб

Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2015) review. Kindle Paperwhite eReader is thin and light and has a brilliant display. Problem International Center! But we would lose some of my essay for me Adelphi University, that for better battery life. Price comparison from , and manufacturers. It’s easy to problem and Holland Study Center forget that Amazon once was just an online bookstore. The Kindle is now such a ubiquitous eReader that’s also easy to forget it is Amazon that makes it. While the company is so much more than books now, its Kindle line remains the go-to eReader range for write for me Adelphi casual and avid readers alike. The Paperwhite isn’t the cheapest or dearest in the range but it marries good design, fair price and a much-needed backlight to make it the and Holland International Center best Kindle for most people. The Kindle Paperwhite is Amazon's mid-range eReader. The Kindle Oasis is essay University (Study Group), now the flagship at a mighty £269, which makes it just about the most important member of the entire eReading fleet. The Paperwhite sits between the entry-level Kindle and the Kindle Voyage. (See also Kindle Papwerwhite vs Kindle Voyage comparison.) For the uninitiated, an eReader is a tablet intended purely for reading eBooks.

Unlike a standard tablet almost all eReaders have e-ink rather than backlit displays. These look like paper and can be read for a long time without developing eyestrain. They can also be read in direct sunlight without reflection. Amazon's Kindle eReaders are the most famous and popular of the eReaders on the market, and the Paperwhite is the top of problem solving Study, that particular range. The best tablets are thinner and lighter than a paperback, and have luminescent displays so that you can read in the dark without putting on the light and disturbing your partner. And, to coursework School make it all worthwhile, an eReader can store thousands of and Holland International Study, books, and access hundreds and thousands more, needing a charge only once every few months or so.

So they need decent storage and connectivity options. The Kindle Paperwhite satisfies all of this and more. But it doesn't come especially cheap in some options. The Kindle Paperwhite is available from Amazon (who'd have thought?) from £109.99 in the UK in black or white. Critical Is SKODA! This price is £50 more than the entry-level Kindle, a decent device in its own right but lacking a backlit screen. There are actually four price points for the Paperwhite though, as you can pay £119.99 for it to and Holland International Study not have adverts on the lock screen. I personally would do this as I balk at lock screen ads on a device I have paid for, and it annoys me Amazon squeezes an coursework High School extra tenner out of you for the privilege. Should you not want to rely on a Wi-Fi connection for all your book downloading and syncing, there’s also a £169.99 version that has free, global 3G connectivity.

This is solving and Holland International, actually amazing, meaning you can download books anywhere in writing expository University (Study the world where there is a 3G signal, completely free (apart from the cost of the books, obviously). Pay an extra £10 for and Holland International no ads on this model and you have yourself a £189.99 Kindle Paperwhite. This is the model I was sent for essay University (Study Group) review, but most buyers will be perfectly happy with the Wi-Fi only, ad-screen £109.99 model, because the essential reading experience on both is problem Study, exactly the same. At this price, then, we expect the best. And by and large we get it. The 2015 vintage Kindle Paperwhite is school coursework Justin-Siena High School, a thin and light black slab, with roughly the footprint of a paperback book, but much thinner and lighter.

To be exact it measures 169 mm x 117 mm x 9.1 mm, and problem solving, the Wi-Fi and coursework School, 3G model we tried we weighed at problem International Study Center, around 219g. The Wi-Fi-only Kindle Paperwhite is a few grammes lighter. That 9mm thickness is enough to make the Kindle Paperwhite comfortable to grip. Critical Is SKODA AUTO! This is problem solving and Holland, helped by critical thinking is SKODA University the slightly rubbery feeling of the Paperwhite's back, offering additional grip. And, of problem solving International Center, course, it is light. I read on critical thinking, this Kindle for hours, lying on my back, and never once felt uncomfortable. And I also put the Kindle Paperwhite through the solving International Study mill, somewhat. It lived in the bottom of my work back, amongst the detritus, keys, smelly gym kit and discarded tech that I consider my critical work-related kit. Two weeks on essay writing companies School, and there is the odd faint smudge on the back cover, but nothing that doesn't quickly rub away with a finger. Solving Study! The Kindle Paperwhite is critical is SKODA University, built to last. It's not a thing of beauty.

But that is okay. The Kindle Paperwhite is problem International Center, good at what it does. Its ugliness stems from the thick black bezels that surround the display. If this was a smartphone you would be annoyed by the wasted space, but in my use I found the Paperwhite to be the right size to hold and use. And the pixels didn't bother me when I was using it to read. This, ultimately, is the critical aspect of any eReader. What is the screen like, and how does it feel to read, read, read? Technically, the Kindle Paperwhite has a 16-level grey scale 6in Paperwhite display with Carta e-paper technology and built-in light. It has a very detailed eReader resolution of 300 ppi, as well as what Amazon calls 'optimised font technology'.

In laymen's terms that means it is an writing essay of Groningen Group) e-ink display that is backlit and super sharp. It is a beautiful reading experience, and when I was reading in bed next to my sleeping wife (and intermittently sleeping baby daughter), the and Holland International Center backlit screen was great too. Clear, comfortable, but adjustable so that I could find a light that was not too bright for me or my bedroom partners. Indeed, my one complaint was that by default the backlit screen was too bright. You could use that thing as a torch. Reading outside in direct sunlight is Queen's College, also great. A real advantage of and Holland International, this kind of essay, eReader over problem solving and Holland Center a general tablet. And the Kindle's fonts are truly excellent, in the sense that - again - the reading experience is so comfortable.

So far so good. Write For Me University! But you are paying a premium for the Paperwhite's 300 ppi display. Given that you can pick up a more bog-standard Kindle for problem solving £59 - albeit one without a backlit display - is the premium model worth the Justin-Siena High premium fee? Certainly I would pay extra for the backlit display, and at £109 the Paperwhite is a good deal. But it has to compete with the solving International Study Nook Glowlight, a backlit eReader that is lighter than the Paperwhite - and cheaper.

I am not personally sure that the 300 ppi resolution makes it worth the upgrade. Although Amazon's unsurpassed library, and the feature set, may be. On which. As well as that unsurpassed high-resolution 300 ppi display and the built-in adjustable light, the main features are Amazon's millions of research Queen's, books in its store, and the fact that you can hold thousands of books on problem solving and Holland International Study, the Kindle itself. Amazon has built-in some additional software features. Without leaving the page, you can query words you don't understand in order to build your vocabulary and learn about characters within books. AUTO University! To be honest, although these features work well in my experience, I don't have much use for problem and Holland Center them. You may! As I mentioned earlier a key advantage of a dedicated eReader is the long battery life. Amazon claims that a single charge will last up to six weeks, and charges via USB in around four hours. That battery life claim is based on half an essay writing companies St. Louis School hour of reading per day with wireless off and the light setting at 10.

Battery life will vary based on light and wireless usage and - reader - it does. I found that I had to charge it around once every 10 days. In once case, after a week. I commute for two hours every day and problem solving and Holland International, read for writing University of Groningen (Study Group) most of that, and I tend to read for half an hour or so in International Study Center the evening. The backlight is on critical, at least once a day, and I never got around to switching off the wireless. All of these things will have legitimately hurt the battery life, but they are also part and parcel of Center, using a well-loved device. Clearly 10 days is not six weeks, and I will admit to being mildly disappointed with the meaning thinking Broward Preparatory School battery life. Irrationally so, because a week is a long battery charge, the Kindle warns you in good time, and there are myriad USB chargers at solving Study, home. St. Louis! I can happily read in bed attached to a charging plug.

I suspect slightly less than stellar battery life is a direct result of that amazing display resolution. Honestly, I would rather better battery life. See also: Best eReaders 2016/2017. Amazon's 6 Paperwhite display with Carta e-paper technology and built-in light, 300 ppi, optimised font technology, 16-level grey scale 169 mm x 117 mm x 9.1 mm Weight Wi-Fi: 205 grams Wi-Fi + 3G: 217 grams Holds thousands of Study, books Free cloud storage for all Amazon content A single charge lasts up to critical is SKODA six weeks, based on half an hour of problem Center, reading per day with wireless off and the light setting at 10. Battery life will vary based on light and wireless usage Fully charges in approximately 4 hours from a computer via USB cable Supports public and private Wi-Fi networks or hotspots that use the 802.11b, 802.11g or 802.11n standard with support for WEP, WPA and WPA2 security using password authentication or Wi-Fi Protected Setup (WPS) Kindle Format 8 (AZW3), Kindle (AZW), TXT, PDF, unprotected MOBI, PRC natively HTML, DOC, DOCX, JPEG, GIF, PNG, BMP through conversion. Writing! Amazon's 6 Paperwhite display with Carta e-paper technology and built-in light, 300 ppi, optimised font technology, 16-level grey scale 169 mm x 117 mm x 9.1 mm Weight Wi-Fi: 205 grams Wi-Fi + 3G: 217 grams Holds thousands of books Free cloud storage for all Amazon content A single charge lasts up to six weeks, based on half an hour of Center, reading per essay companies St. Louis day with wireless off and the light setting at 10. Battery life will vary based on light and wireless usage Fully charges in approximately 4 hours from solving Study, a computer via USB cable Supports public and private Wi-Fi networks or hotspots that use the 802.11b, 802.11g or 802.11n standard with support for WEP, WPA and WPA2 security using password authentication or Wi-Fi Protected Setup (WPS) Kindle Format 8 (AZW3), Kindle (AZW), TXT, PDF, unprotected MOBI, PRC natively HTML, DOC, DOCX, JPEG, GIF, PNG, BMP through conversion.

The Kindle Paperwhite is, by any stretch of the imagination, an excellent eReader. School! Brilliant display, superb design and build, and access to and Holland Study Center an unsurpassed library of eBooks. Our only minor quibble is about battery life, and it isn't the school High School cheapest. Solving And Holland International Study! But even now, we are delighted to recommend the Paperwhite, 2015 vintage. iPhone 8 review. 19 Repeating Pattern Design Tips. Is SKODA! iPhone 8 Plus review. Problem Solving Study Center! Comment changer de mobile en renouvelant son forfait ?

Write My Research Paper for Me -
Holland International Study Centre - Home | Facebook

Essay: Listening comprehension in International Study, the EFL environment. LISTENING COMPREHENSION – THEORY OVERVIEW. This chapter contains an overview of theory related to listening comprehension in EFL environment. AUTO University? First, the problem solving, importance of listening comprehension is discussed. Argumentative Research? Second, difficulties in solving and Holland International Study, listening comprehension for my essay Adelphi University, EFL learners are illustrated. Third, listening comprehension processing is discussed. Fourth, evidences from previous related research that listening instruction could lead to improvement, as measured by pre-tests and post-tests, were discussed. Solving And Holland International Center? Fifth, nature and characteristics of coursework School children’s learning are reviewed. Lastly, research questions of the present study are stated. 1. The Importance of Listening Comprehension.

The increased importance of solving and Holland Study Center listening comprehension in thinking AUTO, language learning may be attributed largely to the development of communicative language teaching approach, which attempts to prepare learners to transfer their classroom skills to real-life context, over the past three decades (Asher, 1977; Krashen, 1982; Omaggio Hadley, 2001; Vande Berg, 1993). There has been a shift from non-teaching listening comprehension in the audio-lingual period to teaching listening comprehension in a strategy-based approach (Mendelsohn, 1998). Before World War II, the problem Study Center, teaching of reading was given the most attention while that of thinking University listening comprehension was the most infertile and the least understood language skill (Winitz, 1981). Problem Solving And Holland International Study Center? Under the predominant audio-lingual approach in the 1960’s and expository of Groningen Group) the early 1970’s, the teaching of listening comprehension was still minor. With the problem International Center, increasing interest towards communicative language teaching approach, several researches revealed the importance of listening comprehension (Brown #038; Yule, 1983; Faerch #038; Kasper, 1986; Feyten, 1991; Long, 1985). Listening comprehension has ever since received a lot more attention in language teaching.

On the one hand, technological advances and the growing awareness of the importance of listening in meaning thinking North Broward Preparatory, the world have made listening even more important in problem and Holland International Center, the communication process (Mendelsohn, 1998). In current globalized society, with universal and massive exposure to radio, television, satellite broadcasts, and internet, individuals are expected to be increasingly prepared to receive information through listening and speaking, more than ever before (Dunkel, 1991; Vande Berg, 1993). On the other hand, some scholars (Nord, 1981; Wintiz, 1981) considered proficiency in listening comprehension as a necessary condition for acquiring production language skills, specifically speaking and writing. The comprehension-based teaching approach supports that students at the beginning level should be allowed to keep silent until they feel safe and ready to produce the essay writing, target language. Thus, it can be reasonably concluded that students are probably engaged in listening before they are able to speak and write in the target language, which means that second language instruction at problem solving Study Center, a beginning level should focus on developing learners’ listening comprehension ability. Still, other scholars (Dunkel, 1991; Long, 1985; Rost, 1990; Vogely, 1999) stressed that listening is important because it provides input as the raw material for learners to process in language learning.

Without correctly understanding the school coursework Justin-Siena High, input, any learning simply cannot begin (Rost, 1994). Problem Solving And Holland International Study? Furthermore, the failure of listening comprehension of the target language is an impetus, not merely an obstacle, to language learning as well as to communication interaction (Rost, 1994). The recognition of the importance of listening comprehension has resulted in thinking School, an increased number of listening activities in students’ textbooks and even in solving International, comprehension-based methodology texts designed specifically for teaching listening (Anderson #038; Lynch, 1988; Rost, 1990; Underwood, 1989; Ur, 1984). Meaning Broward School? Several studies have found that through the use of effective pre-listening activities, instructors can increase students’ understanding of the listening passages, which in turn develops their listening proficiency and contributes to International Study Center, their mastery of the target language (Herron, 1994; Richards, 1983; Rubin, 1994; Teichert, 1996; Vande Berg, 1993). 2. Difficulties in Listening Comprehension for EFL Learners. The first difficulty in school Justin-Siena, listening comprehension for EFL learners is that they are less likely to share the same schema with native speakers (Ur, 1984; Harmer, 2001). As Kant (1781/ 1963) claimed, new information, new concepts, and new ideas can have meaning only when they can be related to solving and Holland International Study, something the individual already knows. This applies as much to second language comprehension as it does to comprehension in one’s native language. The empirical research in of analytical North School, the related field has come to be known as schema theory and has demonstrated the truth of Kant’s original observation and problem solving Center of the opening quote from write my essay for me Anderson et al (1977). Schema theory research has shown the importance of problem solving background knowledge in thinking University, language comprehension (Bartlett, 1932; Rumelhart, 1980; Rumelhart #038; Ortony, 1977).

According to schema theory, a text provides directions for listeners or readers as to problem and Holland International, how they should retrieve or construct meaning from Queen's their own previously acquired knowledge. This previously acquired knowledge is called the problem and Holland Study, listeners’ or readers’ background knowledge, and the previously acquired knowledge structures are called schemata (Bartlett, 1932; Adams #038; Collins, 1979; Rumelhart, 1980). The prior knowledge, or schema, that a L2 listener brings to the listening task plays a vital part in interpreting the material, and should be considered in the evaluation of learners’ listening comprehension (Long, 1990; Raphan, 1996). Based on schema theory, the process of interpretation and comprehension is guided by the principle that every input is my essay Adelphi University mapped against some existing schema and that all aspects of and Holland Study Center that schema must be compatible with the College, input information (Carrell #038; Eisterhold, 1983). Efficient language comprehension requires the ability to relate the textual input to problem solving, one’s own background knowledge, which means that understanding words, sentences, and entire texts relies not merely on critical thinking AUTO University one’s linguistic knowledge but also the knowledge of the world (Carrell #038; Eisterhold, 1983). According to problem and Holland Study Center, Richards (1983), much of our knowledge of the my essay, world is solving Center organized around scripts, which is our memory about write for me, particular situations, the goals, participants, and procedures commonly associated with them, and solving International the information needed to understand is therefore not explicitly present in the utterance but is writing companies St. Louis provided by Study Center the listeners from their repertoire of Adelphi University scripts.

This means that the connections between events need not be specified when we talk about them, since they are already known and can be inferred. Solving And Holland? Without the right kind of pre-existing knowledge, or relevant script, comprehension may become very difficult (Harmer, 2001; Richards, 1983). Non-native speakers may have a different shared knowledge of cultural reference and of analytical North Broward discourse patterning in their own language and culture; their individual scripts may differ in certain degree and content from target language scripts, and that poses additional problems for some foreign language learners who have to work twice as hard to understand what they hear. (Harmer, 2001; Richards, 1983; Underwood, 1989). The second difficulty is that EFL learners are usually much less familiar with different accents and problem that they sometimes have considerable problems when they encounter a new accent in the listening process (Kennedy, 1978). Accent is potentially an argumentative essay College, important variable in listening comprehension (Buck, 2001). Many foreign-language learners who are used to solving and Holland, the accent of their own teacher are surprised when they find they have difficulty understanding someone else (Ur, 1984). An unfamiliar accent can cause problems in communication and may disrupt the whole comprehension process (Buck, 2001; Kelly, 1991). Native speakers are generally used to listening to a variety of accents while EFL learners are less exposed to different accents (Buck, 2001). Essay Of Groningen? Besides, learners who have more experience in listening to and understand a number of problem solving International Study different accents are more likely to be able to cope successfully with listening tasks than those who have only heard one or two (Ur, 1984).

Therefore, it seems reasonable to school High School, conclude that it generally takes a L2 learner much longer to adjust to the voice if the accent is very different from any with which he is familiar than a native speaker (Buck, 2001; Kelly, 1991). The third difficulty is that EFL learners are less capable of perceiving prosodic features in problem International, English speech which have a direct impact on how listeners process and interpret discourse segments (Buck, 2001; Lynch, 1998; Rubin, 1994). The rhythmic pattern of spoken English is one of writing of Groningen its distinctive features (Richards, 1983). Unlike many languages in the world that are syllable-timed, which means that the problem solving and Holland Study Center, length of time required to pronounce an utterance depends upon the number of syllables it contains, English is a stressed-timed language (Buck, 2001; Richards, 1983). What this means is that the time between stressed syllables is reasonably constant in any utterance, and the remaining syllables in the utterance, no matter how many there are, must accommodate to the rhythm established by school Justin-Siena High the stressed syllables (Buck, 2001; Richards, 1983; Vann Lier, 1995).

As a stressed-timed language, the following English sentences would take about the International, same amount of time to articulate, even though the number of syllables contained in meaning of analytical thinking North Preparatory School, each sentence is very different (Richards, 1983; Vann Lier, 1995): The CAT is International INTerested in school coursework School, proTECTing its KITTens. LARGE CARS WASTE GAS. The result of the stress-timed language is that the International Study, words between the stressed syllables are pronounced very quickly, with no stress or mild stress, and University of Groningen (Study Group) if there are more words they are pronounced even quicker to problem solving and Holland Study, fit in the short time, subjecting to meaning of analytical North Preparatory, considerable phonological modification (Buck, 2001). Also, Vanderplank (1988) argues that perception of Center stress is an important factor in rapid and efficient listening comprehension. This adds another dimension to the listener’s task, since listeners must learn the complex set of writing expository University (Study Group) rules that determine the pronunciation of connected speech and be able to identify words according to the rhythmic structure within which they occur (Buck, 2001; Richards, 1983). Any lack of such phonological knowledge can pose comprehension difficulty (Buck, 2001). In the research of Henricksen (1984), most native speakers had little difficulty understanding words in their modified form in an utterance whereas the presence of phonological modification significantly reduces comprehension for second-language listeners.

In addition, Vanderplank (1985) found interesting differences in native speakers’ and non-native speakers’ ability to perceive stress by addressing that ‘native speakers were in general agreement as to sentence stress location, while only a small number of problem and Holland International Study Center non-native speakers agree with native speaker judgments as to stress location, and meaning of analytical Broward Preparatory the ability to perceive stress location was not significantly linked to level of English ability in learners’ (p. 38). Solving International Study? Still, Bond and Garnes (1980) agree that speech perception is also subject to what they call ‘heuristic strategies’ such as paying attention to stress, intonation patterns, and stressed vowels. Research Essay Queen's College? Therefore, listeners need to know how the problem solving Study, sound system works in English speech, in order to research Queen's, be able to process natural listening task in real time (Buck, 2001). The fourth difficulty is problem solving International that hesitation and pausing could cause perceptual problems and school coursework thus comprehension errors for non-native speakers (Voss, 1979). In his study, 22 non-native speakers of English were asked to problem solving and Holland, listen to a passage of school coursework Justin-Siena High School spontaneous speech, about 210 words long. Results indicated that nearly one-third of all perception errors were related to hesitation phenomena. These errors were due to listeners’ either misinterpreting hesitations as words, or parts of words, or to misinterpreting parts of words as hesitations (Voss, 1979).

In contrast, some researches indicated that hesitation and pausing help listening comprehension (Blau, 1990; Blau, 1991; Dunkel, 1988; Friedman #038; Johnson, 1971; Johnson #038; Friedman, 1971). However, Voss is the only one among these researchers who used real and solving Center spontaneous speech. All of the other studies used a written text read aloud. Voss (1979) suggests that native speakers are usually not bothered by hesitation phenomena since they possess strategies to essay, recognize and process such phenomena while focusing on meaning, and non-native speakers get stuck in bottom-up processing of phonetic utterances that do not affect meaning, while native speakers discard these utterances in favour of top-down processing. There are indications that in some cases hesitation and pausing can help listening comprehension, and in others they may cause problems (Buck, 2001). In the researches of Friedman #038; Johnson (1971) and Johnson #038; Friedman (1971), pauses inserted at meaningful syntactic boundaries can benefit comprehension, whereas random pauses do not. When one-second pauses were introduced into a text at the juncture between clauses, comprehension improved, while pauses inserted randomly into the text resulted in lower levels of comprehension (Friedman #038; Johnson, 1971; Johnson #038; Friedman, 1971). Consequently, the ability to problem solving Study, understand spoken English must include the of analytical, ability to deal with hesitation and pausing (Buck, 2001). Hesitation and pausing also affects our impression of the pace of speech (Richards, 1983). Solving Study? The impression of faster or slower speech generally results from the amount of pausing that speakers use (Richards, 1983).

Stanley (1978) suggests that when speech was faster, language learners ‘constantly failed to perceive individual phonemes and hence words with which they were already familiar’ (1978: 289). Comprehension declines as the speakers talk faster, and write Adelphi the weight of the evidence suggests that the decline in problem Center, comprehension is rather slow until a threshold level is reached, at which time an increased speech rate leads to a much more rapid decline in comprehension (Buck, 2001). Griffiths (1990) found potential evidence that speech faster than two-hundred words per minute (w.p.m.) is difficult for lower-intermediate learners to school coursework Justin-Siena, understand. He found that this level of students perform best at 127 w.p.m. Moreover, Griffiths (1992) investigated the effects of problem Study Center three different speech rates (127, 188, and 250 w.p.m.) on listening comprehension of second-language learners and concluded that comprehension was significantly better at the slowest speech rate and worse at research Queen's, the higher rates. On the other hand, Blau (1990; 1991) found that speech ranging from 145 to 185 w.p.m. did not significantly affect listening comprehension of intermediate- and advanced-level L2 learners. As for the general concept of speech rate, Rivers (1981) cites the following figures: Fast: above 220 w.p.m.

Moderately fast: 190-220 w.p.m. Average: 160-220 w.p.m. Moderately slow: 130-160 w.p.m. Slow: below 130 wpm. Besides, Sticht (1971) quotes a normal speech rate of 165 to 180 words per minute for native speakers of English. Solving And Holland International Study? Based on the researches abovementioned, speech rate is one of the variables that affect listening comprehension, which may relate to School, text variables, such as vocabulary, syntax or topic, type of text used, and amount of background knowledge required (Buck, 2001; Rubin, 1994). The fifth difficulty is solving and Holland International Study Center that learners tend to think they have to companies, completely understand what they hear, consequently causing anxiety (Rubin, 1994; Ur, 1984). Most foreign-language learners run into a psychological problem: they have a kind of obligation to understand everything, even things that are not important, and they feel discouraged and may even completely give up listening if they encounter an incomprehensible word (Rubin, 1994; Ur, 1984). Problem And Holland Study? Foreign language beginning learners have to understand all when they hear only single words or short sentences. Critical Is SKODA University? However, when listening comprehension passages get longer, they still assume that total comprehension is successful comprehension, and find it very difficult to get used to the idea that they can be competent listeners with less than one hundred percent comprehension (Ur, 1984).

From the anecdotal evidence in the research of O’Malley et al. (1989), it is found that ”effective listeners seemed to be aware when they stopped attending and made an effort to redirect their attention to the task’ (p. And Holland? 428) and ‘ineffective listeners reported that when they encountered an unknown word or phrase in a listening text, they usually just stopped listening or failed to be aware of their inattention’ (p. 428). Justin-Siena High School? Foreign-language learners have this difficulty probably because their receptive system is overloaded (Ur, 1984). They have to Center, work much harder at decoding than native listeners and try to interpret every detail as it comes up instead of relaxing and taking a broader view. Compared with reading and writing, listening is more stressful for learners since it involves serious time constraints on processing, which cause learners’ anxiety (Ur, 1984).

3. Listening Comprehension Processing. Most models of listening perception in meaning North Broward Preparatory School, language learning include what is usually referred to as top-down, bottom-up and interactive processing. 3.1. Solving And Holland International Center? Top-down processing. In top-down processing, the essay Queen's, listeners need to use their pre-existing knowledge to interpret or get a general view of the listening passage and to Study Center, create appropriate and plausible expectation of what they are about to come across (Harmer, 2001; Goodman 1967; Shohamy #038; Inbar, 1991; Smith 1971). Top-down processing occurs as the perceptual system makes general predictions based on general schemata, or prior knowledge, and then searches the for me University, input, either visual or auditory, for information to fit into, or verify these predictions, and thus top-down processing is conceptually-driven or knowledge-based (Carrell #038; Eisterhold, 1983; Shohamy #038; Inbar, 1991). In the study of Shohamy and Inbar (1991), it was reasonably hypothesized that listeners who employed a knowledge-based approach first made predictions about the passage they were about to listen to, basing their predictions on the questions they previewed prior to listening. Problem International Study Center? In the first listening listeners might have checked their hypotheses and only afterwards, in a second listening, may have filled in the information gaps by coursework School supplying the local cues. Bacon (1989) and Vande Berg (1993) found that appropriate pre-listening activities could benefit learners’ comprehension for various listening exercises. Advance organizers, such as brainstorming (Vande Berg, 1993), illustrations and key words (Teichert, 1996), picture prediction (Harmer, 2001) and making inferences after listening to a series of sentences (Brown, 2001), can be used to solving and Holland, facilitate learners’ top-down processing and help them be engaged in listening tasks. 3.2.

Bottom-up processing. In bottom-up processing, the listener focuses on individual words and University Group) phrases by problem solving International Study decoding the expository essay of Groningen (Study, linguistic input rapidly and accurately to refute implausible interpretation, and achieves understanding by combining these detailed elements together to build up a whole view of the listening passage (Harmer, 2001; Carrell 1983, 1988; Carrell #038; Eisterhold 1983; Rost 1990). Thus, bottom-up processing is data-driven or text-based (Carrell #038; Eisterhold, 1983; Rubin, 1994). There are two types of comprehension strategies identified by Van Dijk and Kintsch (1983): one is local strategies which require learners’ attention to relations and links between the facts denoted by local clauses and problem solving and Holland Study sentences, and the other is global/ macro-strategies which require a focus on the overall coherence, gist or topic of essay writing companies St. Louis a text. Based on the statements above mentioned, it can be concluded that the local strategies are related to bottom-up processing while the global/ macro-strategies are related to solving International Study Center, top-down processing. Kelly (1991) proposed that in St. Louis, the early stages of problem solving and Holland International Study Center foreign language learning, learners rely very much on writing St. Louis bottom-up processing when listening and only when they consider that they are making progress to the proficiency and skills in problem solving International, the foreign language, they bring into semantic and thinking is SKODA other knowledge related to problem solving and Holland Study, top-down processing. Some bottom-up pre-listening activities were proposed by meaning thinking several researchers to solving and Holland, make listening comprehension easier. Providing listeners with key vocabulary before listening proved valuable in Raphan’s (1996) and Rost’s (2002) studies. Harmer (2001) mentioned a bottom-up processing activity of finding differences between a written text and a recorded account of the same events that can be implemented in teaching listening. Adelphi? Another bottom-up activity for beginning listeners is to listen to a series of sentences and then circle one (out of three) verb form contained in the sentences (Brown, 2001).

3.3. Interactive processing. Listening comprehension is considered by some researchers as an solving and Holland Study Center, interactive process between top-down and bottom-up processing and as a continuous modification of a developing interpretation in response to incoming information and pre-existing knowledge (Brownell, 1996; Buck, 1991; Harmer, 2001). Perception occurs when sufficient information has been provided both from the companies School, expectations set up by top-down processing and from linguistic input by bottom-up processing (Kelly, 1991). According to Kelly (1991), if the solving and Holland Study, sound signal is Justin-Siena High weak, obscured or incomplete, the listener will probably make greater use of top-down processing; similarly, it is when the listener’s expectations are low or not sensible that he will need to rely more on the sensory level and to hear clearly what is being said by solving and Holland International Study Center bottom-up processing, and such view of perception processing would probably fit in with almost all current models of auditory speech perception. Similarly, some studies have indicated that effective listening comprehension takes place when the listener can successfully monitor their interpretation by constantly checking it against the incoming linguistic cues and to modify their hypotheses accordingly (Tyler #038; Warren, 1987; Buck, 1990). In his research, Buck (1990) indicated that a number of thinking is SKODA listeners monitored the incoming information with what they had already heard before or with their background knowledge to develop their interpretation of the listening text.

Further, there were instances in his study that serious comprehension problems had occurred when listeners failed to notice their developing interpretations were incompatible with the incoming information. Problem Center? In addition, O’Malley, Chamot, and Kupper (1989) indicated that bottom-up processing is essay only fragmentary for efficient EFL listeners; they activate more L1 knowledge in the form of schemata and use both top-down and bottom-up strategies to construct meaning. Hildyard and Olson (1982) found that efficient listeners and and Holland International readers use the knowledge-based interactive mode of text processing, while low level students relate mostly to local details. According to Rumelhart (1980), both top-down and bottom-up processing should be occurring at all levels simultaneously: bottom-up processing ensures that the listeners will be sensitive to school High School, information that is new or contradictory to their ongoing hypotheses about the text; top-down processing helps the listeners to resolve ambiguities or to select between alternative possible interpretations of the incoming data. 3.4. Problem Solving International Center? Effectiveness of top-down and bottom-up processing. There is argumentative research essay Queen's continuous discussion about the solving, role of top-down and bottom-up processing in listening comprehension, but little could we conclude whether top-down or bottom-up processing is more important to essay School, a listener. Some studies indicated that successful listening comprehension depends more on top-down processing. Problem Solving And Holland? In the researches of Carrell #038; Eisterhold (1983), Conrad (1981, 1985), Hildyard #038; Olson (1982), Kelly (1991), Meyer #038; McConkie (1973), Rumelhart (1983), Shohamy #038; Inbar (1991), Van Dijk #038; Kintsh (1983), it is found that skilled listeners, like proficient readers, use a knowledge-based mode of text processing, namely top-down processing, whereas less-skilled listeners and readers both attend mostly to local details as in the bottom-up processing.

Similarly, Voss (1984) found that ‘successful speech perception depends on essay an active reconstruction process applying top-down strategies to the acoustic input, i.e., assigning ultimate values to segments and International Study Center other lower-order units on the basis of hypotheses about a larger stretch’ (p. 148). Thinking University? In Weissenreider’s (1987) study, schemata which are crucial in top-down processing were found to be beneficial in and Holland International, listening comprehension. Her results show that both textual schemata (knowledge about the newscast processing) and content schemata (topic familiarity with specific news) help the listening comprehension of non-native speakers, particularly when participants are capable of incorporating cognitive strategies. Lund (1991) provides evidence for top-down processing in Justin-Siena School, his study by comparing listening and reading of first-, second-, and third-semester university students of German.

He concluded that participants relied considerably on top-down processing in listening tasks. Wolff (1987) worked with twelve- to International Study, eighteen-year-old German students of English and found that while students appeared to make a simultaneous use of bottom-up and top-down processing with an writing of Groningen Group), easy listening text, they used more top-down processing strategies for more difficult texts. In addition, some researches indicated that beginners rely very heavily on background knowledge and hardly use other cues in listening comprehension while learners with better linguistic proficiency use their greater linguistic knowledge and experience to help them understand a text (Mueller, 1980; Vandergrift, 1997). Thus, providing background information and previewing are particularly important and effective for the less proficient language student to solving and Holland International Center, comprehend a text (Hudson, 1982). Nevertheless, some studies indicated that successful listening comprehension relies more on bottom-up processing than on top-down strategies. Schemata in top-down processing can also have dysfunctional effects on writing essay University listening comprehension (Long, 1990; O’Malley et al., 1989). In Long’s (1990) study, participants completed a survey of their background knowledge of two topics used, namely, gold rush and rock groups, and he found that participants overextended their gold rush schemata onto a set of data that were clearly incompatible.

It is problem and Holland Study Center clear, then, that schemata can hurt, as well as help listening comprehension and it can also be inferred that linguistic knowledge plays a prominent role in comprehension when appropriate schemata are not available to High School, the listener (Long, 1990). 4. Evidences from Previous Research Related to Listening Comprehension. Results from previous research that instruction can lead to solving International, listening improvement, as measured by meaning North Preparatory pre-tests and problem solving and Holland post-tests, are inconsistent. On the one hand, there was no significant improvement in writing essay Group), the studies of Johnson and Long (2007), O’Malley et al. (1985), and McGruddy (1995). Johnson and problem solving and Holland Long (2007) assessed listening competency of college students through the Watson-Barker Listening Test (Watson #038; Barker, 2000). There were no significant differences between the essay Queen's, scores of and Holland International Center pre- and post-test after listening instruction, indicating that listening instruction did not influence performance-based listening ability. O’Malley et al. (1985) found differences, but not statistically significant, in the scores at University of Groningen (Study Group), the post-test of EFL learners who received different types of solving and Holland International Study Center listening instruction. In the research of McGruddy (1995), significant differences in pre-test and post-test were observed merely in a non-standardized listening test rather than in a standardized test. On the other hand, some studies revealed more success in terms of listening instruction. In the study of write for me Adelphi Nichols, Brown and Keller (2006), the trained group of 31 freshman students made significant gains in scores during the period of listening instruction.

In Kohler’s (2002) study, 70 learners of Spanish at a university received listening instruction. Their listening comprehension significantly increased, compared with the non-intervention group. However, there does not appear to have been a pre-test of learners’ listening comprehension, without which it is difficult to conclude Kohler’s claim of International Study Center significant improvement in listening comprehension of the experimental group. In addition, in the study of Graham and Macaro (2008), 151 senior high school students of French as a foreign language in AUTO University, England were targeted, and problem solving and Holland Study Center a positive impact of listening strategy instruction was noticed. Students who underwent listening instruction significantly outperformed those who did not receive such instruction, and students reported that they themselves recognized this improvement. 5. Characteristics of argumentative essay Queen's Children’s Learning. Based on the theory of solving Study Piaget and Inhelder (1969), there are four phases of children’s cognitive development, which are sensory-motor period, preoperational period, concrete operation period and school Justin-Siena High School formal operation period. The period of concrete operation generally represents the elementary school students, ranging from 7 to 12 years old. Children in the concrete operation period begin to problem Center, think logically. Operations are associated with personal experience and are in concrete situation, but not in abstract manipulation.

Children’s learning in this period relies heavily on writing University (Study Group) operational activities, such as objects, pictures and physical experiments. Another theory concerning children’s learning is the scaffolding theory (Wood, Bruner, #038; Ross, 1976) which was developed based on the concept of zone of proximal development proposed by Vygotsky (1978). Zone of proximal development refers to the differences between the level of solving and Holland International Center actual development and the level of potential development; the level of meaning of analytical thinking North Broward Preparatory actual development means children’s actual independent problem-solving competence while the and Holland Study, level of potential development means children’s problem-solving competence developed either through the leading or guidance from adults or instructors or through the collaboration or cooperation with more competent peers (Wertsch, 1984). The zone, or the difference, of proximal development does not mean a fixed distance or concrete space of of analytical thinking Broward Preparatory learning; rather, it refers to problem International, the possible, learnable scope created by the interaction between people and its changes with the development of individuals (Cole, 1985; Moll, 1990). Scaffolding, when applied in writing expository essay University of Groningen (Study Group), teaching practices, generally refers to the development of learners’ gradual comprehension of solving Center knowledge through the interaction between the instructor and the learners. In such interaction, teachers, as assistants in children’s learning process, provide necessary assistance to coursework, foster learners’ cognition with the consideration of learners’ development level. The interaction which is the and Holland International Study Center, scaffolding in the teaching process generally follows the essay School, pattern of question asking from the teacher, replying from problem solving and Holland Center students, specific guidance of asking further questions from the teacher, and then replying from thinking Broward School students. According to Harmer (2001), young children learn differently from adolescents, and adults in many ways. Children tend to respond to meaning even if they do not understand individual words.

They learn from everything around them rather than only focusing on the precise topic they are being taught. Their understanding comes not just from explanation, but also from what they see and hear and, crucially, from what they have a chance to touch and interact with. In addition, children have a limited attention span, unless activities are extremely engaging or interesting they can easily get bored, losing interest after around ten minutes. In the solving Center, light of these characteristics, teachers at this level need to essay of Groningen (Study Group), provide a rich diet of problem and Holland International Study Center learning experiences which encourages students to get information from St. Louis School a variety of sources (Harmer, 2001). In addition, in the process of scaffolding in teaching, it is essential for teachers to be skilful in asking questions to problem and Holland International Study, activate students’ thinking and creativity, which are helpful in deepening and broadening the language development of the students. Teachers are suggested to avoid closed-ended, unimportant or forcing questions, but to provide open-ended, supportive or guiding ones to encourage the interaction between teachers and students. Teachers need to work with their students either individually or in groups to develop good relationships, and write my essay for me Adelphi University need to plan a range of activities for a given time period, and to be flexible enough to move on to the next exercise when they see their students getting bored. 6. Research Questions of the Present Study.

Listening comprehension is important for EFL learners. Beginning instruction in a second language should focus on developing learners’ listening comprehension. In Romania, formal EFL beginning instruction falls in elementary education, a phase in which listening comprehension should be paid attention to. And Holland International? It is likely that listening instruction in elementary school puts more emphasis on bottom-up listening processing than on top-down processing. As Kelly (1991) noted, EFL beginning learners rely very much on bottom-up listening processing, it is possible for elementary students to resort more to bottom-up processing when listening. Although some studies have investigated either the effects of different advance organizers on listening comprehension of undergraduate and junior-high school students (Sherman, 1997; Vande Berg, 1993; Herron, Hanley, #038; Cole, 1995) or how to teach high school students listening skills more effectively, little research has been done regarding the teaching of listening in write my essay Adelphi, elementary school, which is the beginning level of EFL learners. From the above discussion in the theory review, little research has targeted elementary EFL learners in terms of listening instruction. The effect of listening instruction, as measured by Study pre-tests and post-tests, are inconsistent in previous research which mostly involved undergraduate and high school students.

Although it is writing expository University apparent that listening involves both top-down and bottom-up processing, most elementary English learners tend to focus on bottom-up rather than top-down processing (Kelly, 1991). Therefore, it would be valuable to investigate the solving and Holland International Center, effect of listening instruction as well as the listening processing of elementary EFL learners. The present study focused on three research questions: (1) Do interactive processing teaching activities result in better listening performance than bottom-up teaching activities? (2) Why or why not? (3) When do elementary EFL learners rely on top-down processing, bottom-up processing and interactive processing? To address the research questions, comparison of performance between two groups was conducted after the two groups of participants had respectively received a series of listening instruction, namely interactive pre-listening activities and bottom-up pre-listening activities so that the effectiveness of different pre-listening activities could be evaluated to investigate whether interactive processing activities lead to better performance than bottom-up processing activities. Furthermore, a questionnaire was administered for the interactive group after the argumentative research essay College, post-test to investigate when elementary EFL learners rely on solving Study top-down processing, bottom-up processing and interactive processing. Search our thousands of essays: If this essay isn't quite what you're looking for, why not order your own custom Education essay, dissertation or piece of meaning North Preparatory School coursework that answers your exact question? There are UK writers just like me on solving International Study hand, waiting to help you. Each of us is qualified to a high level in our area of expertise, and we can write you a fully researched, fully referenced complete original answer to your essay question. Thinking Broward Preparatory School? Just complete our simple order form and you could have your customised Education work in your email box, in as little as 3 hours.

This Education essay was submitted to us by and Holland International Study Center a student in order to essay St. Louis School, help you with your studies. This page has approximately words. If you use part of this page in your own work, you need to provide a citation, as follows: Essay UK, Essay: Listening comprehension in the EFL environment . Available from: http://www.essay.uk.com/essays/education/essay-listening-comprehension-in-the-efl-environment/ [03-10-17]. If you are the original author of problem and Holland International Center this content and no longer wish to meaning of analytical thinking North Preparatory School, have it published on our website then please click on problem solving and Holland Center the link below to critical, request removal: 13-09-17 - Management strategies on learner discipline 27-05-17 - The challenges of trilingual education in Kazakhstan 24-05-17 - Motivation and problem solving International Center speaking skills 03-05-17 - Academic libraries 25-04-17 - Clinical education 18-02-17 - Instructional Simulation 21-12-16 - Motivation of teachers - Teaching foreign languages in critical thinking AUTO, Romania – the rank of the ESL 11-11-16 - ETHICS FOR LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE (LIS) PROFESSIONALS 26-08-16 - INITIATING IMPROVISATION (USED AND UNUSED MATERIAL) WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF ART EDUCATION PRACTICE. We offer professional custom essay writing, dissertation writing and coursework writing service.

Our work is high quality, plagiarism-free and delivered on solving Center time. Essay UK is a trading name of companies Student Academic Services Limited , a company registered in England and Wales under Company Number 08866484 .